Posts Tagged ‘NPR’

The Geometry of Oenophilism: Why Our Imaginations Matter, & Why Wine Matters

November 24, 2012

I was listening to the radio today — NPR, if you must know — and a sports report came on.

As you may or may not know, sports coverage on NPR can be slightly different than perhaps other iterations of the form. As but one example, one of the main NPR Sports correspondents opens and closes his program not with something from Black Sabbath, Motley Crue, or Guns n’ Roses, but with the following rather fine slab of athleto-centric gospel from Sister Wynona Carr:

Life is a ballgame

Bein’ played each day

Life is a ballgame

Everybody can play

Jesus is standin’ at home plate

Waitin’ for you there

Life is a ballgame,

But you’ve got to play it fair.

 

Amen Sister Wynona, amen!

Anyhow, as I was saying, sports coverage on NPR can be a tad different at times, and this morning’s effort was no exception. The correspondent on this morning’s program was discussing the impending arrival of Rutgers and Maryland to the halls of the Big Ten, and was in fact rather bemoaning the circumstance. In fact, he described the situation a tad starkly, in that he referred to it as being symptomatic of “a big money grab.”

Which is an altogether cynical stance, it seems to me, to say the least.

Which is really neither here nor there, as far as I’m concerned. What interested me far more was what he next said, which was essentially that, if sports matter at all, it’s because they matter in our imaginations, and accordingly, anything enacted that disabuses our imaginations of their passions cannot be a good thing.

Meaning, essentially, that overt and transparent displays of commercialism and profiteering in college sports are deeply disappointing, because they rather harshly puncture the elevated zeppelins of our imaginative lives.

So, to reiterate, he said that sports matter in our imaginations.

And mind you, he did not say this cynically!

Which accordingly makes his statement, then, a rather extraordinary statement; one clearly in defense of — nay, in praise of! — our imaginations.

Because what he actually said was, in effect, that our imaginations matter.

Which is exactly why wine matters.

Wine matters in our imaginations, and our imaginations matter, thus, wine matters.

This is the geometry of oenophilism. Wine matters in our imaginations, and our imaginations matter, thus, wine matters.

You see, seen from the cynical side, it’s actually just fermented grape juice, right? Just another alcoholic beverage? Isn’t it just another product, sold at a profit, in just another store, to just another consumer?

Isn’t it?

Or is it?

Ask the father who bought Monte Bello from his daughter’s birth year. Ask the sister and brother who return to Monte Bello every year to toast the anniversary of their mother’s passing with a bottle of Estate Chardonnay. Ask the new fiancé why he proposed over a glass of Geyserville. Ask Thomas Keller why, if it was his last meal on earth, he’d want it served with Lytton Springs.

Thomas Keller

Ask your imagination.

In A Land Of Painted Thirst, Painted Wine Will Slake The Thirsty

September 9, 2012

If one writes a wine blog (as I do), then one ought to be quite grateful that there is a Tom Wark in the world (as I am).

Why?

Because it’s actually quite difficult sometimes, to come up with new subject matter each and every day, and while I’m not above simply entering the day’s date in Wikipedia in hopes that something will jar my imagination loose (who knew that Leo Tolstoy and Otis Redding shared a birthday?), or that some strange and tangential bit of semi-wine-related arcana will emerge (did you know that today is the day California was admitted as the 31st state?), it is often much easier to simply go to Tom’s blog (Fermentation: The Daily Wine Blog), and just spin off of whatever he’s gotten up to.

In this particular case, I actually have the pleasure and honor of spinning off a spin-off that was a spin-off to a spin-off! Meaning, he wrote something, and later I wrote in response to it, and then he did me the great honor of referencing what I wrote about, and I’m now going to write about his referencing!

Make sense?

It all has to do with Art & Jazz & Wine.

And should you wish to do so, you can follow the threads of thoughts by clicking the following links:

http://fermentation.typepad.com/fermentation/2011/12/charlie-parker-and-the-notion-of-wine-as-art.html

http://blog.ridgewine.com/2012/08/29/is-wine-is-or-is-wine-aint-art-charlie-parker-tom-wark-and-the-question-of-intentionality/

http://fermentationwineblog.com/2012/09/brittany-bird-simple-wine/

In Tom’s second post above, he concludes by writing the following:

The moral of the story is that like with music, with wine it is sometimes best to simply give somebody what they want, no matter what it is they want and no matter what your opinion is of what they want. In the end, you’ll be less exasperated and they will be much happier.

To which I’ll respond by quoting, and then paraphrasing, jazz musician Branford Marsalis, who spoke recently on NPR about the rumor that he only plays classical and jazz music for his children. Here is what he had to say:

When my kids were younger, one of the mothers of one of the kids in the school came up and said, “I heard that you only play jazz and classical music for [your] daughters.” And it was clear that she only played pop music for her kids. And I said “Well, yeah.” And she said “Why?” I said, “When you listen to a song like a Raffi song — a song about alligators or kangaroos or whatever it is — it’s about that, it’s about kangaroos. But, if you play Eine Kleine Nachtmusik for your kid, the music is whatever your kid wants it to be about. It’s instrumental music. The kids’ imaginations can run wild.

He then goes on to note that he knows his kids will be exposed to pop music by their peers, and so he feels it to be important that he expose them to that which they might not get via other channels. Meaning, if he doesn’t play them classical and jazz, who will?

Meaning, perhaps the moral of the story is that sometimes it’s best not to give people what they want, but to give them something they might not get otherwise.

Something special. Something that will allow their imaginations to run wild.

Should you be interested, a transcription of the full Branford Marsalis NPR interview referenced above can be found here.

Deep bows to Tom Wark. An inspiration, a gentleman, a writer.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers

%d bloggers like this: