Posts Tagged ‘Jancis Robinson’

This Is Dedicated To The One I Love -or- Get Up! Get Into It! Get Involved!

April 10, 2013

HVS_Logo

The Historic Vineyard Society (HVS) has a Mission Statement I think we can all get behind:

HVS (Historic Vineyard Society) is a non-profit, 501 C-3 organization dedicated to the preservation of California’s historic vineyards. HVS’s Mission is  accomplished through educating the wine-drinking public on the very special  nature of this precious and depleting state, national and global resource.

Amen!

~

And, the Historic Vineyard Society has a serious roster of talent behind it that I think we can all admire:

David Gates (Ridge Vineyards)

Mike Officer (Carlisle Vineyards)

Jancis Robinson (author and wine critic)

Tegan Passalacqua (Turley Wine Cellars)

Morgan Twain-Peterson (Bedrock Vineyards)

Hallelujah!

~

And, the Historic Vineyard Society has an agenda I think we can all support:

Help to Preserve California’s Living Historic Vineyards!

The California Assembly Agriculture Committee has unanimously agreed to approve HR 9, a resolution that seeks to raise awareness of California’s living historic vineyards through State recognition of the contribution that these vineyards have made, and continue to make, to the agricultural and social history of California. HR 9 was introduced by Assemblymember Tom Daly (District 69, Anaheim) and is supported by the Historic Vineyard Society. With the approval of the Agriculture Committee, HR 9 will now go to a vote before the full Assembly, which is expected in the next several weeks.

HR 9 can be viewed here.

Please demonstrate your support for California’s living historic vineyards by calling, writing or emailing your local Assembly Member. Contact information for the California Assembly can be found here.

~

And, the Historic Vineyard Society knows how to mix business & pleasure! Dig this:

HVS
Historic Vineyard Society 3rd Annual Vineyard Tour and Dinner
Saturday, May 11, 2013 • 1:15 to 8:00 p.m. • Healdsburg, California                        

Join Mike Officer, David Gates, Bob Biale, Morgan Twain-Peterson, Tegan Passalacqua and special guests as the Historic Vineyard society celebrates historic vineyards in the Alexander and Dry Creek Valleys.

The day will include a tour of four historic vineyards (with bus transportation provided by Pure Luxury) and dinner at Seghesio Family Vineyards. The price is $215 per person, all inclusive of historic vineyard wines, tax, gratuity and a tax-deductible donation to the Historic Vineyard Society.

Tickets may be purchased: here.

For more information and to make your reservation, please visit: here

~

DELICIOUS SPOILER ALERT!

Straight from David Gates: the inside scoop on WHICH Historic Vineyards event guests will visit! Check THIS out!

“The vineyards we will be visiting are Henderlong (Nalle), Seghesio Home Ranch/Chianti Station (Seghesio), Vineyard 101 (Turley), and the Old Patch at Whitton Ranch (Ridge!). ” –David Gates 

Did he just say the Old Patch? Crazy! One of the most fascinating plots of vineyard land in all of California! Dig this:

GY_OldPatch

As James Brown once exhorted you, I know too exhort you …

Get Up! Get Into It! Get Involved!

Ten Questions for Paul Draper: #7!

August 23, 2011

The second week of our special ten-question series with Paul Draper continues today with question #7!

7-    Jancis Robinson has compared Monte Bello Chardonnay to a Grand Cru Burgundy. Were you inspired by the great wines of Burgundy when made your Chardonnay?

 That is very kind of Jancis but I didn’t know very much about how white burgundies were made, but had a sense of what a fine white wine was all about.  We made the wines in a straight forward, non-manipulative manner and slowly perfected our techniques.  We were trying to make fine wine not imitating Burgundy but the Monte Bello terroir gave us a quality and character with some similarities to Burgundy.

***Do you have a question for Paul? Let us know! wine@ridgewine.com***

(“10 Questions for Paul Draper” questions composed by Rodrigo Mainardi of Mistral, Brazlian Distributor for Ridge Vineyards)

Paul Draper grew up on an eighty-acre farm in the Chicago suburb of Barrington. After attending the Choate School and receiving a degree in philosophy from Stanford University, he lived for two years in northern Italy. Later he attended the University of Paris and traveled extensively in France, gaining practical experience in traditional winemaking. In the mid-sixties, with a close friend, he set up a small winery in the coast range of Chile and produced several vintages of cabernet sauvignon. He joined Ridge Vineyards in 1969, and presently resides atop Monte Bello Ridge with his wife Maureen and daughter Caitlin. He is known for his crafting of fine cabernets and chardonnays from the Monte Bello estate vineyards, and as a pioneer in the production of long-lived, complex zinfandels.

Paul Draper on “Pre-Industrial Winemaking”

April 19, 2011

Simply can’t resist the temptation to share this; personally, I think it’s just brilliant, and one of the best, most relevant contemporary treatises on all things related to –pick your term(s) de riguer– “natural” winemaking; “non-interventionism”; “sustainability”; “minimum impact”; “biodynamism”; etc.

Of course I’m biased, but then again, there are more than a few reasons why Paul Draper enjoys the reputation that he does. I hope you enjoy what he has to say here  …

PRE-INDUSTRIAL WINEMAKING AT RIDGE

There is a lot of buzz in the wine world these days about “natural” winemaking, a term which seems to mean different things to different people. Is it organic and/or biodynamic grape growing? The refusal to use additives and processing? Minimal intervention in the winemaking process? It is such a confusing and, to some, a negative term, that we prefer something more accurate to describe what we do at Ridge.

The UK’s foremost wine critic, Jancis Robinson, has said that over 90% of the wine produced in the world today is “industrial.” Taking off from that statement, our winemaking at Ridge for the last fifty years can best be described as “pre-industrial.” In 1933, after thirteen years of Prohibition, there was only a handful of winemakers trained in pre-Prohibition traditional techniques who were young enough to come back to their old jobs. Those winemakers, at historic Fountain Grove, Larkmead, Nervo, La Cuesta, Simi, and Inglenook —to name a few, produced a number of truly great cabernets and zinfandels. In the 1970s, I was privileged to taste a broad range of those wines when they were thirty-five years old and older. The majority were still showing beautifully, and I found several of them to be as complex as the great Bordeaux vintages of the late 1940s. These were pre-industrial wines.

With the end of Prohibition, the University of California at Davis stepped in to fill the need for winemaker expertise in this country, and began, year by year, to reinvent winemaking as an industrial process. In 2010, in Issue 30 of The World of Fine Wines, arguably today’s top wine publication, Master of Wine Benjamin Lewin describes how all too many California cabernets are made today:

“The move to harvesting grapes with brutally high sugar levels has led to some ingenious ways of adjusting alcohol levels…When you have a must that is simply too high in Brix, you add some water to bring the sugar level down to a level that will ferment, then you bleed off some juice as fermentation begins to mitigate the effects of dilution. Some winemakers add acid to musts of high Brix before adjusting concentration; this is called the acid whip.”

The style of red wine this approach produces—generally referred to as the “international” style—can involve use of reverse osmosis; the addition of Ultra Purple, a 2000 to 1 concentrate; and chemically sterilizing the wine with Velcorin (Di-methyl dicarbonate.) Because it is being made around the world, California should not be singled out. The wines can be heavy, rather than fresh. When tasting 2007 cabernets recently, Eric Asimov of the New York Times noted:

“…we were disappointed to find so many uniform, monochromatic wines with little finesse…Instead of complexity, the rule seems to be all fruit, all the time, with power deemed preferable to elegance.”

At Ridge, we felt from the beginning that these modern, increasingly industrial, wines lacked the complexity, the sense of place, and the ability to age and develop that the pre-industrial wines demonstrated. So we looked back to the 19th Century—to techniques used in the finest California wineries such as La Cuesta, and in the Bordeaux châteaux of that era. In a synthesis of past and present, we have taken the pre-industrial techniques and applied them in conjunction with the best, least intrusive modern equipment. We’ve been told that we have the most sophisticated analytical laboratory of any winery our size. Given our minimal use of SO2, we depend on lab analyses to alert us to any problem long before it could be perceived by tasting.

We’ve employed these winemaking techniques at Ridge for fifty years, with the goal of making the best, most site-specific wines possible. The starting point is having great vineyards. We were blessed by having the 125-year-old Monte Bello vineyard, abandoned after Prohibition, and its now-sixty-year-old cabernet vines, replanted in the late 1940s. Searching for the best, most expressive sites, we made our first zinfandel in 1964 from eighty-year-old vines. In 1966 we made our first Geyserville—from vines that are now one hundred and thirty years old—and have made it every year since. 1972 marked our first Lytton Springs, from vines planted in 1902. Over the following years, we found that those two, out of more than fifty old-vine zinfandel vineyards we have worked with, were producing the highest quality wines—most complex and consistent in their individual character. In 1990, we took over the Geyserville vineyard on a long-term lease with right of first refusal. In 1991 and 1995, we acquired the eastern, and then the western, portion of the vineyard lands first planted by “Captain” Litton in the 1870s. They, with Monte Bello, make up our three estate vineyards. Farming them sustainably, we attempt to carry the soil, the microclimate— everything affecting the site—into the wine, and to gain a true sense of place. Today, the three provide 75% of the fruit we use, and they will soon be organically certified. That means we use cover crops, integrated pest management techniques, mechanical weed removal, and composted grape pomace in place of pesticides, herbicides and synthetic fertilizers.

Because taste is the overriding factor behind our harvesting decisions, we pick when the grapes are ripe, but not overripe. All our grapes (estate or purchased) are hand-picked, which allows for sorting in the vineyard.

Our winemaking philosophy includes fermenting entirely with native yeasts from the vineyard, rather than cultured yeast strains; extracting color, flavor, and tannins from the grapes without use of commercial enzymes; determining—by tasting for tannin extraction during fermentation—how long to continue pump-overs; allowing malolactic fermentation to occur naturally, without inoculation; achieving wine clarity through settling and racking; making major winemaking decisions, including blending, based on tasting rather than a pre-determined recipe.

Through years of experience, we have found that minimal additions of sulfur are essential to avoiding the ever-present risk of wine oxidation or spoilage, which destroys the individual vineyard character of the wine. We add a small amount of SO2 when the grapes are crushed, after malolactic fermentation, and very small amounts at quarterly rackings, rigorously maintaining the minimum effective level for each wine.

Occasionally, if we have a wine lot (or an entire, assembled wine) with excessive tannin, we may fine it gently, using fresh egg whites. The egg whites precipitate to the bottom of the tank or barrel, improving balance by removing a portion of the tannin, and by further integrating the wine. When the whites have formed a firm layer, we slowly rack the clean wine off this sediment. Pad filtration then removes any remaining trace of egg white. We avoid membrane sterile filtration, a process which—to a minor but noticeable degree—affects flavor and complexity.

Tasting the zinfandels throughout their time in the cellar allows us to select those lots that best express each vineyard’s character, and combine them as the vineyard-designated wine. Lots with less intense individuality are then combined—based on blind tasting—into our one multi-vineyard wine, Three Valleys.

For the Bordeaux varietals, which are all grown on the Monte Bello vineyard, the approach is somewhat different. After years of experience, we have found that the parcels can be divided roughly in half based on the style of wine each has produced in past years. One group is more approachable, and develops its full complexity earlier; from these, we select the Estate Cabernet Sauvignon. The other, though balanced and enjoyable as a young wine, begins to develop its full depth, complexity, and superb quality with a minimum of ten years’ aging. The Monte Bello is selected by blind tasting from these parcels. The first assemblage for both takes place in early February, following vintage. A second, that considers press wine and lots that were not yet stable in February, takes place in May. Thus, from one vineyard, we make two wines—distinct in style, but sharing the vineyard’s individuality.

In summary, Ridge bases grape-growing in each vineyard on long experience with the site, while simultaneously making use of the most recent advances in vineyard management. Pre-industrial winemaking begins with respect for the natural process that transforms fresh grapes into wine, and the 19th-Century model of minimum intervention. When you have great vineyards that produce high quality grapes of distinctive individual character, this is not only an environmentally and socially responsible approach, it’s also the best way to consistently make fine wine.

–Paul Draper, 3/2011

Thank you Paul, a much-needed summation, in my humble estimation.

Jancis Robinson on Ridge Vineyards in the Financial Times!

March 15, 2010

In the aftermath of our 50th Anniversary Celebration and Retrospective Tasting here at Ridge Vineyards (more details on this soon!), there has been some lovely and lively writing appearing in a wide array of formats and publications, and I’d like to call your attention to the first of many we’ll be looking at, a wonderful write-up in the Financial Times by Jancis Robinson. You can find the article by clicking here.

Did Gary Vaynerchuk compare Ridge Geyserville to Big League Chew?

September 10, 2009

Q:

Did Gary Vaynerchuk just compare Ridge Geyserville to Big League Chew?

 

A:

Not exactly, but for what I imagine might be the first time ever, Big League Chew and Nerds both came up while discussing the 2006 Ridge Geyserville! The conversationalists in question were one Gary Vaynerchuk and one Jancis Robinson, and the setting was Wine Library TV. To read a lovely article about all the above, please follow this link  to Eric Asimov’s post (from this past Tuesday) on his wonderful New York Times-based blog The Pour. To see the original Wine Library TV episode where this all takes place, please click here.

Wine Writers and Ethics: Food For Thought?

May 28, 2009

Has anyone out there read the lastest on Wine Writer Ethics in the Wall Street Journal? I know Jancis Robinson has written extensively about this issue recently, and Dr. Vino has played a big role in exposing some of the incidents that led to this becoming a hot topic, so you may already be hip to the brouha-ha, but if you haven’t yet dug into the subject, I recommend giving this a read, and of course, please feel free to post your thoughts!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124330183074253149.html

Return To Forever: Revisiting the 1993 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello

May 1, 2009

As discussed in a previous post, I’ve been looking forward to a re-visit of the 1993 Ridge Monte Bello, and I’ve just had my opportunity this past Sunday. And I must say, I was in particularly good company for the visit; I was with Harris Davidson, from our brilliant Canadian distributors Rogers & Co., and four Toronto Wine Buyers: Bronwen Clark, Taylor Thompson, Jason Ernst, and William Predhomme. This was a supremely gifted and insightful group of tasters, and I was beyond happy to host them.

Prior to the ’93 Monte Bello we tasted the new 2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay, the new 2007 Geyserville, the new 2006 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Cabernet Sauvignon/Merlot, and the not-yet-released 2006 Monte Bello, all of which seemed to be met with great satisfaction on the part of our Canadian guests. And then came the ’93 Monte Bello. I served out of a 375ml bottle, single-decanted, and out of the decanter itself. What followed was some great and fascinating conversation about the ’93 specifically, and Monte Bello in general. In the end, what we found ourselves discussing more than anything else was the “Bordeaux” factor.

It’s probably clear testament to the pervasive influence of wines from the Bordeaux region on the calibration of international palates that the term is thrown around as often as it is. In the worlds of the various creative arts, I see a great many reviews that start with the disclaimer, “The term ‘genius’ gets inappropriately thrown about these days with far too much regularity, but in this case …”. I see the same thing with “Bordeaux” in the world of wine. In a great many circles, it remains the highest of compliments to say something to the effect of, “In a blind tasting, I would have thought this was a Bordeaux …” The Monte Bello has certainly benefitted from just this sort of critical comparison, and of course we’ve taken it as high praise every time. Jancis Robinson has compared the Monte Bello to great Bordeaux wines in her writings, Slate has called the Monte Bello “California’s First Growth,” and the very eminent Stephen Spurrier has oft made the comparison in various ways, as have Robert Parker Jr., Stephen Tanzer, and more.

Anyhow, when tasting the ’93 MB, my Canadian guests and I did indeed find ourselves discussing the Bordeaux factor, and in the end, collectively agreeing that the ’93 in fact did seem not only distinctly “Bordeaux-esque”, but in fact, and quite possibly, one of the most so of the past 20 years of Monte Bello vintages. If I may speak for the group, I think it’s safe to say we found it (and admittedly, I am making a collective generalization here!) rustic, lean, elegant, low in alcohol, with intensely deployed acidity and supple tannins, showing a great array of herb and spice combinations. And yes, the term did come out: “barnyard.” We had a bit of conversational fun with that one, and then of course checked ourselves, but recognizing no trace whatsoever of brettonomyces, we again simply concluded that the ’93 Monte Bello really did just have a touch of that old-world rustic funkiness so often associated with the Bordeaux style.

Perhaps a post on what exactly the Bordeaux style IS would be fun to discuss? Something to ponder for the future …

8-vintage Monte Bello Vertical Review At JancisRobinson.com!

April 27, 2009

Jancis Robinson has written a fascinating review of  8 different Monte Bello vintages at her site, jancisrobinson.com. If anyone reads her article, please let me know your thoughts, and if you have your own tasting notes to compare and contrast, all the better! (Please feel free to send them across, thank you!)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 137 other followers

%d bloggers like this: