Posts Tagged ‘James Laube’

Chardonnay Showcase!

August 12, 2010

Round Two of our Summer Wine Series touches down on terra firma this coming Saturday, and it affords a literally first-in-a-lifetime tasting opportunity; never before have we offered a flight like this one! In addition to closing with the very highly regarded 2006 Monte Bello (94 points Robert Parker/92 Points Wine & Spirits!) and the very rare 2007 Geyserville Essence  (only the 13th Essence in our 50+ year history!), we are pouring not one, not two, not even three, but FOUR different Ridge Chardonnays! 

Chardonnay, on display, at Lytton Springs!

I think it’s probably safe to say that Ridge has built its reputation on a red wine program comprised of world-class zinfandels and international-stature cabernet sauvignons, but did you know we’re also one of the most well-regarded chardonnay producers in California? 

As but two examples as regards our Monte Bello Chardonnay, consider Matt Kramer’s words in Wine Spectator, 

“If you say “Ridge” the automatic word association is “red.” (Or, alternatively, “Zinfandel.”) But one of Ridge’s greatest wines is white, specifically its Monte Bello Chardonnay.” 

Or, consider James Laube’s numerical rating of this wine (also in WS); 95 points! (Joshua Greene has given 90+ point ratings to this wine in Wine & Spirits as well, as has Robert Parker). Or how about our Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay? #2 on Wine Spectator’s Top 100 list for the 2005 vintage, a Year’s Best in Wine & Spirits for the 2007 Vintage, and a 93 points from Wine Spectator for the current 2008 vintage? Not so very bad! 

Now, add to all that the 2008 Jimsomare (debut vintage!) and the 2008 Mikulaco Chardonnay (only the second vintage!) with all of 700 cases made between them, and you’ve got yourself quite a chardonnay showcase! 

You can get the full specs on the event here, but here’s the brass tacks: 

The fee for this flight will be $25/person (non-members), and $10/person (members). No reservation is required. (For our guests who opt not to participate in the Summer Wine Series event, we will offer, as always, a Guest-Member flight option for $5/person.) Best of all, if you return on a following Saturday with your receipt from a previous Saturday’s tasting, your flight is complimentary, and we’ll include a 6-bottle Ridge Vineyards eco-tote! 

As noted above, our Monte Bello and Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnays have been nicely well chronicled in the world of wine writing, but given that both the Mikulako and Jimsomare Chards are not only new and extremely limited-production, but not available anywhere else but through us, I thought it might be worth posting some tasting notes, in case you’ve not yet tasted them. So here are some notes for you, should you be so inclined: 

2008 Mikulaco Chardonnay 

Strong mineral component in the aromatics right out of the gate, accompanied by hints of lemon and raw almond; in the glass, fairly spry legs bespeaking a lighter-side mouthfeel — toasty and viscous on the tip-of-the-tongue at point-of-entry, with crisp mountain fruit acidity lining the side-tongue sensors, and some warmer, toastier layers hovering just between – the cool-climate acidity at side-tongue lingers long into the mid-palate, carrying forward a chalky minerality mitigated by an almost honey’d mouthfeel; the regularly stirred lees lend some weight here, while the (very rare) deployment of french oak adds a rich nutty fleshiness — Overall, mid to high-tone fruit, and while somewhat short of finish, it’s definitely wide of palate, with enough acidity to sip alone in warmer months, enough viscosity to lend this to the summer table with aplomb, and enough minerality to keep things interesting throughout. By comparison to other Ridge chardonnays, it’s lighter and arguably less complexly multi-dimensional, but it’s also fresh, eminently drinkable, and displays a savvy degree of culinary companionabilty for the warm months. 

2008 Ridge Vineyards Jimsomare Chardonnay 

Pale straw-yellow tones in the glass, interwoven with warm gold highlights, and exhibiting both great clarity and rich viscosity. Hints of wheat and yeast on the nose, balanced by some citrus, a strong minerality, and a nice spread of multiple strains of pear (Bosc, Anjou, and especially Bartlett). Weighty on the palate, and even warmer and more viscous than the aromatics foreshadow; toasty, but not burnt, with compelling hints of warmed milk and crème fraiche.  The finish is long and chest-fillingly pleasant, balancing a savory toasted-honey character with a sparkling re-display of mountain minerality. 

And I think that says it all, so please, join us for this very special Chardonnay Showcase!

92 Points For The 2008 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay!

May 10, 2010

Lovely news! The Insider newsletter (May 5th, 2010) from Wine Spectator contains James Laube’s review of the newly-released 2008 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay, and he’s given it 92 points!

Ridge

Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains Estate 2008

92 points | $40 | 2000 cases made | White

Fresh and snappy, with ripe, firm, vibrant, full-bodied citrus, green apple, spice and honeysuckle flavors that turn delicate and elegant. Drink now through 2016.—J.L.

James Laube, Wine Spectator, And The 1997 Monte Bello!

April 29, 2010

For those of you who haven’t yet seen it, James Laube of Wine Spectator has recently written on the 1997 Ridge Monte Bello. You can find his article here:

http://www.winespectator.com/wwdn/show/id/42558

It’s an interesting article, for a number of reasons, and I’m wondering if any of you had reactions similar to mine? Let me know!

 

(p.s. you can find some of my recent tasting notes on the ’97 monte bello here: http://blog.ridgewine.com/2010/02/19/tasting-notes-15-vintage-monte-bello-vertical-milestone-and-milestones/)

The 1996 Monte Bello, Some Quick Tasting Notes …

June 29, 2009

I just had a quick but lovely chance to take a nice taste of the 1996 Monte Bello out of a 375ml; something I’ve not had the opportunity to do for a while, and let me tell you, it was quite a treat; one of the finer showings I’ve had the pleasure of sampling recently. At the 750ml size I’d definitely still recommend flexing some patience, but if you’ve a 375ml on hand of the ’96, you certainly don’t need to feel guilty if you pop it tonight!

Anyhow, my notes, with some others to follow:

Appearance:
A black plum middle with a double-banded halo of inner blood-orange pulp and outer salmon-raspberry. Thick bowl glaze indicating supple and rich viscosity…

Aromatics:
Teriyaki and Soy Sauces right out of the gate, followed by parallel strains of ketchup and fried green tomatoes on one side, and cinnamon, clove, pepper steak, white pepper, and tarragon on the other, making for an intensely complex and hunger-inducing bouquet…

Front:
Bright, vivacious acidity, softly granular tannins, mouth-watering cranberry skin characteristics, tanginess of fruit pectin, and the sweetness of cherry pastries…

Mid-palate:
Still a little youthful warmth on the roof of the mouth, but otherwise a nice balanced spread of acid against tannin, fruit against spice …

Finish:
Long, warm, chest-filling, and deeply satisfying. A quick whiff of the glass ten minutes after emptying it reveals nice sweet fruit and lingering caramel undertones …

Summary:
As noted above, one of the most pleasurable Monte Bello tastings in my recent memory!

And here are some other thoughts:

Paul Draper, writing back in 1998, had this to say:

“Sensuous and complex, with layered fruit and beautifully integrated tannins, this is among the loveliest of the ‘90s. Accessible as a young wine, it will develop further with twelve to fifteen years of bottle age.”

And Stephen Tanzer, my oft-quoted personal wine-reviewer favorite, wrote this in 2000, which I think is particularly spot-on:

“Good full bright ruby. Wild, super-ripe aromas of cassis, plum, cocoa, soy sauce, leather, roasted game and plum sauce, all lifted by a floral note. Lush, thick and dense, but the currant, black cherry and menthol flavors are still austere. The slight green note repeats on the long finish, which features faintly gritty tannins. In an awkward stage today, but has all the elements to make a superb bottle.”

And here’s perhaps the most unexpected kicker; James Laube, who’s occasionally been known to be ever so slightly tough on us every once in a while, gave this vintage a 96 point rating in Wine Spectator!

Monte Bello Collector Event/Final Assemblage Tasting: Part I, The Vintage Pack Vertical – 1995 Monte Bello, 1997 Monte Bello, & 1999 Monte Bello!

May 18, 2009

We’ve just had quite an event here this past weekend, our Monte Bello Collector Final Assemblage Tasting, and among the many treats on offer was the opportunity to try the three selections that comprise our new Vintage Pack offering: the 1995 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello, the 1997 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello, and the 1999 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello.

I’m a big fan of the nineties in general for Monte Bello, and this chance to have a look at some of the vintages from the second half of the decade was quite special. Despite being run pretty ragged over the course of the weekend trying to keep up with the pace of the event (thank the powers that be for having such a great staff on hand to keep everything working so smoothly!), I did manage to sneak a little time to sit down and really contemplate these three wines. Here are my notes:

1995 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello

Appearance: Deep, inky black plum middle with a perfectly glowing raspberry-toned halo … Fairly svelte and swiftly moving legs coursing over an elegant and thorough bowl glaze …

Aromatics: Great notes of cinnamon and clove; a strong autumnal character. Very present notes of cedar as well as a hint of menthol and some black licorice …

Front: Strong berry notes right away, quite fruit-forward; surprisingly present but gentle acidity balanced against very soothing tannins …

Mid-Palate: Medium to bright red fruit notes begin to emerge, as does some bright cheek acidity, which is timely, as the adhesion of the tannins begins to intensify slightly …

Finish: Lovely residual vibrancy from the ever-so-slightly tangy acidity …

Summary: I’ll summarize by playing off a slightly vexing review from 2000 by one of my favorite writers, Stephen Tanzer, who wrote of the 1995 Monte Bello:

“… Comes across as quite austere due to its strong acids and slightly tough tannins. Has intensity, but will this wine ever truly blossom in bottle? Reminded me of a lot of old Bordeaux that showed fascinating aromas but never quite delivered in the middle palate. Draper has defended this wine from the outset, but I’ve never yet been convinced.”

If this is what it tasted like in 2000, then I would definitely say it has “developed” in the bottle! The acids are no longer strong per se, I rather found them quite mouth-wateringly elegant. And the tannins are certainly no longer tough (I described them in my original notes as “soothing”!). I think I can agree that the mid-palate may not yet be delivering all that is hoped for, but judging by the progress of this wine on other fronts, I don’t think it’s a foolish bet to bank on continued expansion and expressiveness in the middle.  At the risk of sounding like a company man, I think I’m with Paul in defending this vintage!

1997 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello

Appearance: Hues and tones of blackberry, plum, and black cherry, with a beautiful translucent strawberry-toned limn … Classic legs and glaze; elegant, yet strong …

Aromatics: Ripe, rich plumminess, some cocoa, strong hints of boysenberry, a little leatheriness, a little black tea, some baked blueberry pie, just a trace of forest floor; incredibly unique all around …

Front: Very light tip-of-tongue acidity, and nice wide side-tongue acidity. Not much fruit or tannin right out of the gate; a little closed at the front …

Mid-Palate: Fascinating potpourri of dried flavors; dried cranberry, dried apricot, dried lilac and rose petals; some black cherry notes as well. Also, some hints of anise, roasted nuts, and just a fleeting debut of eucalyptus … tannins are largely concentrated in the mid-palate, as are the dominant fruit notes of black cherry and black plum …

Finish: Very elegant, no heat, and supple tannins, which, despite their seeming restraint, are still taking the driver’s seat over the acids, which are currently riding shotgun…

Summary: Altogether fascinating for its complexity, with an underlying question of balance as regards tannins and acids; in a review also from 2000, James Laube of Wine Spectator wrote that the 1997 had “tannin to lose,” so if that was the case then, then I think this wine is continuing to move in a great direction, as the tannins have clearly been re-calibrating in relationship to the acidity. Meaning the answer to the underlying question noted above should be a positive one!

1999 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello

Appearance: Very rich coloration; rich, inky pigment with a belly of black plum and black cherry, and a clear and bright halo of raspberry … Quite thin legs, but a very firm and adhesive overall glaze …

Aromatics: Dominated by varying tiers of cherry, with underlying layers of cocoa butter, truffle oil, and white pepper. Very earthy overall … and I swear, there is even a faint trace of candied ginger!

Front: Tons of youthful tannins right up front, complementing a very spicy character; quite vivacious acidity, with a granular, crushed-rock sort of minerality showing through as well …

Mid-Palate: Intertwining strains of mandarin and blood orange, joining some dried apricot, and the always reassuring notes of plum and dark cherry …

Finish: A short-to-medium duration for the fruit overtones, and a longer-lingering presence from the rich tannic architecture …

Summary: Appropriately showing the “youngest” of the three, but highly notable for the depth, concentration, and singularity of the earth and spice components. For my final compare-and-contrast with notable wine writers, we’ll this time turn to Steve Heimoff, who wrote in Wine Enthusiast back in 2005, “Will be very good, but don’t touch it until 2014,” which seems to confirm the youthful character of this fine vintage. And by the way, he then went on to give the wine a 95 point rating!

 

And that’s my Vintage Pack notes! More on the Collector Event soon …

93 Is The Magic Number: 2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay Receives 93 Points From Wine Spectator!

May 14, 2009

Well, this is probably a bit anti-climatic now, as I already gave away the punch line in the title of this post, but the new vintage of our Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay has received a 93 point rating from Wine Spectator!

 

93 Ridge Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz Mountains Estate 2007 • $40

Combines richness with an elegant, delicate mouthfeel, showing deep layers of ripe fig and green pear, honeydew melon and smoky oak. Balanced, focused, pure and lingering. Drink now through 2013.

—J.L.

 

07HSE1-L


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers