Posts Tagged ‘Eric Asimov’

Freshness, Energy, and Balance: In Pursuit of Zinfandel

December 21, 2012

I lived in New York once, and then left, and then moved back and lived there again. That should tell you something about my feelings for New York.

That said, I lived in Northern California once, and then left, and then moved back, and I am now here to stay. That should also tell you something about my feelings for New York.

That said, my missus and I have maintained our subscriptions to The New York Times and The New Yorker.

Meaning, I read Eric Asimov.

Because, as the great and wise Tom Hill says, he has original thoughts. And because, as I say, his heart and his palate are in the right place.

So when Eric wants to talk Zinfandel, I want to listen.

Particularly because Eric doesn’t normally much like Zinfandel.

Fortunately, it turns out he likes ours.

It was an odd quest Mr. Asimov recently set out on; a search for Zinfandels evidencing restraint.

Zinfandels that exhibited freshness, energy, and balance.

Fish in a barrel, or Nessie in the Loch?

They searched, they selected, they tasted. The results?

You could say we were mildly disappointed by our tasting. Certainly, lower alcohol levels by themselves are no guarantee that a wine will be lively and energetic. Yet we hope that more zinfandel producers will embrace the notion that wines can be both agile and intense rather than aiming simply for blockbuster power.

Ok, sounds like it didn’t go very well, right?

Not so!

They did indeed find the wines they were hoping for, just not a great many of them. But the ones they did love, they really loved. And they weren’t even surprised to be loving them. Dig this:

Our No. 1 wine was no surprise. For decades, Ridge has been making great zinfandels from its old-vine vineyards in Sonoma County, and the 2010 from Lytton Springs in Dry Creek Valley was yet another. It was hefty enough at 14.4 percent but beautifully structured, nuanced and refreshing.

I knew I admired Eric for a reason!

In all seriousness, I do indeed admire what he’s done here, because he is raising vital questions relevant not just to the world of wine, but to the world in general. Inadvertently perhaps, but he is  raising them just the same.

What he is really doing, is asking us to face our definition of power.

What is power?

Buson

As a species, we’re pretty feeble in many ways. We cannot fly like birds fly. We cannot “breathe” under water as fish can. Our eyes are weak, and we cannot see in the dark. Our ears are weak, and we cannot hear long distances or wide pitches. We cannot hibernate like bears, nor run as fast as cheetahs. Our skin is fragile; it protects us from neither heat nor sun. We do not live as long as turtles.

What we can do, or should I say, what we do have, is brains. Big brains, with big thoughts in them. And by virtue of our brains, we have achieved a unique sort of power in the world.

But what is important, what is so very important to remember, is the origin of this singular power. It is not a power rooted in physical strength. It is not a power rooted in size, or velocity, or scale. It is not a power of oppression, or violence. It is a power of nuance, and complexity. It is a power of responsivity; compensational in nature, conciliatory in spirit. It is a power of compromise, humility, and respect.

It is a power of observation, a power born from the act of seeing the world, and striving to find a place in it. It is an integrative power.

Misused, it becomes all the things it is, in fact, not. It becomes violent. It becomes oppressive. It becomes ugly. It becomes destructive. Eventually, it ceases even to be power. It becomes merely a weapon.

There is power in a haiku. There is violence in a gun.

Drink freshness, energy, and balance.

Drink haiku.

Before the white chrysanthemum
the scissors hesitate
a moment.

(Yosa Buson, translated by Robert Hass)

To read Eric’s full article, please click here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/dining/exploring-zinfandels-that-hold-back-on-power.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

Paul Draper on “Pre-Industrial Winemaking”

April 19, 2011

Simply can’t resist the temptation to share this; personally, I think it’s just brilliant, and one of the best, most relevant contemporary treatises on all things related to –pick your term(s) de riguer– “natural” winemaking; “non-interventionism”; “sustainability”; “minimum impact”; “biodynamism”; etc.

Of course I’m biased, but then again, there are more than a few reasons why Paul Draper enjoys the reputation that he does. I hope you enjoy what he has to say here  …

PRE-INDUSTRIAL WINEMAKING AT RIDGE

There is a lot of buzz in the wine world these days about “natural” winemaking, a term which seems to mean different things to different people. Is it organic and/or biodynamic grape growing? The refusal to use additives and processing? Minimal intervention in the winemaking process? It is such a confusing and, to some, a negative term, that we prefer something more accurate to describe what we do at Ridge.

The UK’s foremost wine critic, Jancis Robinson, has said that over 90% of the wine produced in the world today is “industrial.” Taking off from that statement, our winemaking at Ridge for the last fifty years can best be described as “pre-industrial.” In 1933, after thirteen years of Prohibition, there was only a handful of winemakers trained in pre-Prohibition traditional techniques who were young enough to come back to their old jobs. Those winemakers, at historic Fountain Grove, Larkmead, Nervo, La Cuesta, Simi, and Inglenook —to name a few, produced a number of truly great cabernets and zinfandels. In the 1970s, I was privileged to taste a broad range of those wines when they were thirty-five years old and older. The majority were still showing beautifully, and I found several of them to be as complex as the great Bordeaux vintages of the late 1940s. These were pre-industrial wines.

With the end of Prohibition, the University of California at Davis stepped in to fill the need for winemaker expertise in this country, and began, year by year, to reinvent winemaking as an industrial process. In 2010, in Issue 30 of The World of Fine Wines, arguably today’s top wine publication, Master of Wine Benjamin Lewin describes how all too many California cabernets are made today:

“The move to harvesting grapes with brutally high sugar levels has led to some ingenious ways of adjusting alcohol levels…When you have a must that is simply too high in Brix, you add some water to bring the sugar level down to a level that will ferment, then you bleed off some juice as fermentation begins to mitigate the effects of dilution. Some winemakers add acid to musts of high Brix before adjusting concentration; this is called the acid whip.”

The style of red wine this approach produces—generally referred to as the “international” style—can involve use of reverse osmosis; the addition of Ultra Purple, a 2000 to 1 concentrate; and chemically sterilizing the wine with Velcorin (Di-methyl dicarbonate.) Because it is being made around the world, California should not be singled out. The wines can be heavy, rather than fresh. When tasting 2007 cabernets recently, Eric Asimov of the New York Times noted:

“…we were disappointed to find so many uniform, monochromatic wines with little finesse…Instead of complexity, the rule seems to be all fruit, all the time, with power deemed preferable to elegance.”

At Ridge, we felt from the beginning that these modern, increasingly industrial, wines lacked the complexity, the sense of place, and the ability to age and develop that the pre-industrial wines demonstrated. So we looked back to the 19th Century—to techniques used in the finest California wineries such as La Cuesta, and in the Bordeaux châteaux of that era. In a synthesis of past and present, we have taken the pre-industrial techniques and applied them in conjunction with the best, least intrusive modern equipment. We’ve been told that we have the most sophisticated analytical laboratory of any winery our size. Given our minimal use of SO2, we depend on lab analyses to alert us to any problem long before it could be perceived by tasting.

We’ve employed these winemaking techniques at Ridge for fifty years, with the goal of making the best, most site-specific wines possible. The starting point is having great vineyards. We were blessed by having the 125-year-old Monte Bello vineyard, abandoned after Prohibition, and its now-sixty-year-old cabernet vines, replanted in the late 1940s. Searching for the best, most expressive sites, we made our first zinfandel in 1964 from eighty-year-old vines. In 1966 we made our first Geyserville—from vines that are now one hundred and thirty years old—and have made it every year since. 1972 marked our first Lytton Springs, from vines planted in 1902. Over the following years, we found that those two, out of more than fifty old-vine zinfandel vineyards we have worked with, were producing the highest quality wines—most complex and consistent in their individual character. In 1990, we took over the Geyserville vineyard on a long-term lease with right of first refusal. In 1991 and 1995, we acquired the eastern, and then the western, portion of the vineyard lands first planted by “Captain” Litton in the 1870s. They, with Monte Bello, make up our three estate vineyards. Farming them sustainably, we attempt to carry the soil, the microclimate— everything affecting the site—into the wine, and to gain a true sense of place. Today, the three provide 75% of the fruit we use, and they will soon be organically certified. That means we use cover crops, integrated pest management techniques, mechanical weed removal, and composted grape pomace in place of pesticides, herbicides and synthetic fertilizers.

Because taste is the overriding factor behind our harvesting decisions, we pick when the grapes are ripe, but not overripe. All our grapes (estate or purchased) are hand-picked, which allows for sorting in the vineyard.

Our winemaking philosophy includes fermenting entirely with native yeasts from the vineyard, rather than cultured yeast strains; extracting color, flavor, and tannins from the grapes without use of commercial enzymes; determining—by tasting for tannin extraction during fermentation—how long to continue pump-overs; allowing malolactic fermentation to occur naturally, without inoculation; achieving wine clarity through settling and racking; making major winemaking decisions, including blending, based on tasting rather than a pre-determined recipe.

Through years of experience, we have found that minimal additions of sulfur are essential to avoiding the ever-present risk of wine oxidation or spoilage, which destroys the individual vineyard character of the wine. We add a small amount of SO2 when the grapes are crushed, after malolactic fermentation, and very small amounts at quarterly rackings, rigorously maintaining the minimum effective level for each wine.

Occasionally, if we have a wine lot (or an entire, assembled wine) with excessive tannin, we may fine it gently, using fresh egg whites. The egg whites precipitate to the bottom of the tank or barrel, improving balance by removing a portion of the tannin, and by further integrating the wine. When the whites have formed a firm layer, we slowly rack the clean wine off this sediment. Pad filtration then removes any remaining trace of egg white. We avoid membrane sterile filtration, a process which—to a minor but noticeable degree—affects flavor and complexity.

Tasting the zinfandels throughout their time in the cellar allows us to select those lots that best express each vineyard’s character, and combine them as the vineyard-designated wine. Lots with less intense individuality are then combined—based on blind tasting—into our one multi-vineyard wine, Three Valleys.

For the Bordeaux varietals, which are all grown on the Monte Bello vineyard, the approach is somewhat different. After years of experience, we have found that the parcels can be divided roughly in half based on the style of wine each has produced in past years. One group is more approachable, and develops its full complexity earlier; from these, we select the Estate Cabernet Sauvignon. The other, though balanced and enjoyable as a young wine, begins to develop its full depth, complexity, and superb quality with a minimum of ten years’ aging. The Monte Bello is selected by blind tasting from these parcels. The first assemblage for both takes place in early February, following vintage. A second, that considers press wine and lots that were not yet stable in February, takes place in May. Thus, from one vineyard, we make two wines—distinct in style, but sharing the vineyard’s individuality.

In summary, Ridge bases grape-growing in each vineyard on long experience with the site, while simultaneously making use of the most recent advances in vineyard management. Pre-industrial winemaking begins with respect for the natural process that transforms fresh grapes into wine, and the 19th-Century model of minimum intervention. When you have great vineyards that produce high quality grapes of distinctive individual character, this is not only an environmentally and socially responsible approach, it’s also the best way to consistently make fine wine.

–Paul Draper, 3/2011

Thank you Paul, a much-needed summation, in my humble estimation.

Another Carignane Evangelical Goes On A Mission!

February 8, 2011

It is with great pleasure, pride, and excitement that I celebrate another voice in the great Carignane mission; enter Chiara Shannon, head sommelier at K&L Wine Merchants in Redwood City. Chiara has recently begun writing for the K&L blog, and with one fine missive, she has outed herself as a devout Carignane believer!

You can read her post here.

For those of you who would like to do a little digging into this blog’s own humble history of posts in defense of this oft-unjustly-maligned varietal whose star is in fact very much in the ascendancy (and some other contributions as well!), please feel free to enjoy the following links:

http://blog.ridgewine.com/2009/11/09/eric-asimov-the-pour-welcome-to-the-fight-or-carignane-wins-again/

http://blog.ridgewine.com/2009/07/13/a-carignane-confluence-or-a-conversion-conversation-or-monroe-on-carignane/

http://blog.ridgewine.com/2009/06/18/more-on-carignane-or-carignane-tom-hill-and-me-or-how-the-ridge-vineyards-1992-whitten-ranch-carignane-changed-everything-for-me/

http://blog.ridgewine.com/2009/06/16/carignane-redux-or-where-the-wild-thing-is-or-20000-leagues-under-the-carignane-or-dont-blame-the-varietal-for-the-method/

Eric Asimov on “Natural Winemaking”

June 15, 2010

It’s a hot-button topic in the world of wine, that’s for sure, and it goes by many names; non-interventionism, minimum impact, or perhaps the most familiar: natural. Natural Winemaking is a subject that comes up often these days, and it appears to be a rather polarizing one. But perhaps the real conundrum is the seeming lack of a definition. Just what is “natural winemaking?”

Eric Asimov, on his blog The Pour, has just published a really interesting article on exactly this subject, and if this is a topic of interest to you, I heartily recommend you check it out. And perhaps even more fascinating is the comment feed; proof for sure of just how ticklish the issue is.

Give it a read, read the comments, maybe post some thoughts of your own, and please feel free to share some perspective here as well. Our own Paul Draper makes an appearance in the article, and Ridge has of course weighed in on innumerable variations of the subject over our many decades of our engagement with the land, and the practice of winemaking.

You can read Eric’s full article here.

Asimov’s The Pour On Ridge at 50!

March 16, 2010

Eric Asimov, the very fine wine writer for The New York Times, and host of The Pour, recently spent an afternoon here at Ridge Vineyards, on the eve of our 50th Anniversary Celebration and Retrospective Tasting, enjoying a private preview of all that we’d be showcasing and celebrating in the coming days.

His article about his visit is a lovely testament to all Ridge has achieved in these past 5 decades, and a fine display of admiration for Paul Draper’s 40-years of philosophy-first winemaking. Reading it, I felt again the pride that coursed through me when I was first offered a position here. I consider it a great honor to be a part of something so very special, and somehow, reading the graceful prose of a man who so clearly recognizes the singular magic that is Ridge, brought it all back home to me again.

Speaking of Paul’s philosophies, by the way, I’d like to note one particular quote from the article. In explaining how and why Ridge makes wines, Paul said “We’ve always made wines that we loved to drink.” Well said Mr. Draper, well said indeed!

Cheers to you Eric Asimov, for writing such a lovely tribute, cheers to you Paul Draper for all you’ve done and continue to do, and cheers to Ridge for 50 stunning years!

You can read Mr. Asimov’s full article here.

Ridge For Thanksgiving! -or- Ridge Wine In The News! -or- An Admittedly Boastful Post, Full Of Bi-Coastal Toasts!

November 17, 2009

Well, I must say, it’s been a rather nice week in the news for Ridge, and I’m very happy to see that our holiday appeal appears to be bi-coastal, in that both the New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle recently highlighted Ridge wines for their Thanksgiving Dinner companionability!

The New York times article, written by Eric Asimov, recounts this year’s edition of an annual pre-Thanksgiving tasting:

For six consecutive years, the Dining section’s wine panel has gathered for an early Thanksgiving meal. The mission: to taste potential holiday wines, to determine what works and what does not with a representative feast, and to offer coherent answers to the annual question of what to serve with the bird.

In the red wine category, our 2007 Three Valleys was elected the proverbial Best In Show:

Sam brought our top-rated red, a 2007 Three Valleys zinfandel from Ridge. I always run counter to the Thanksgiving bromide that zinfandel is the perfect American wine for the most American holiday. Zinfandel is often too big and alcoholic. But at 14.3 percent, this zin was well balanced and almost sleek.

On the other coast, Jon Bonné wrote a pair of linked Thanksgiving-theme articles recently; in the first one, from 11.13.09, he gives readers a very helpful general guide to selecting wines for the Thanksgiving table, and in the second, from 11.15.09, he provides tasting notes on some of his personal recommendations. He wrote the following about our 2007 Geyserville:

2007 Ridge Geyserville Sonoma County ($35) A classic Geyserville that shows off why Ridge’s style has endured. Sweet and eloquent, with charred branch, balsam, plump blackberry and a smoky edge. The balance is impeccable. Predominantly Zinfandel, with Carignane, Petite Sirah and Mourvedre.

So, if you’re beginning the process of selecting your wines for Thanksgiving, I am happy to suggest a little something from Ridge!

Eric Asimov & The Pour: Welcome To The Fight! -or- Carignane Wins Again!

November 9, 2009

“Welcome to the fight.” Do you recognize that quote? Actually, the real line was “Welcome back to the fight.” But I don’t know for sure if Asimov was in the fight to begin with, and if he was, I don’t know that he left. Which is all a little obtuse, I realize. Here’s a hint on the quote:

Paul_Henreid_and_Humphrey_Bogart_in_Casablanca_trailer

It’s from “Casablanca.” Unquestionably the best movie ever made.

But what about Carignane? Well, somehow this article slipped under my radar back in October, but Eric Asimov, that highly esteemed member of the wine intelligentsia who writes the wonderful blog The Pour for The New York Times, recently penned an article for his blog about the oft-maligned varietal that is Carignane. And he came out swinging in its defense which, if you’re a reader of this blog, you’ll know is the same side of the fence I plant my big black boots on. The article was titled “Give A Grape A Chance,” and that pretty clearly lays out his mission statement.

In the tasting room, when discussing this varietal, I always concede that Carignane does indeed get a bad rap. But my sense is that this disrespectful summation has long been a case of blaming the grape for the method. A parallel example would be, say, Chardonnay. It too has gotten a bad rap over the years, but again, it’s a case of blaming the grape for the method. Chardonnay didn’t ask to be flabby and over-oaked, and it wasn’t born that way. Flabbiness and over-oakedness get thrust upon it, and when that approach becomes the dominant paradigm, eventually the lines separating the grape and the method blur, and the recriminations begin.

The same can be said of Carignane. Here is the opening salvo fired by Asimov in his article:

To call the carignan grape much maligned doesn’t begin to capture the contempt many people in the wine trade have for this poor grape.

And for what? For centuries of overcropping? For being planted in the wrong places? For making thin, astringent, acidic wines that can vary from inconsequential to brutal? That’s supposed to be the grape’s fault?

Not a dissimilar line of inquiry from a recent post (from June) on this blog, which carried the following title/mission statement:

Carignane Redux -or- Don’t Blame The Varietal For The Method? -or- Finding Time For An Oft-Maligned Vine

So as you can see, Asimov and I are on the same wavelength here. And I believe you should be too. Carignane is capable of producing wines of exquisite complexity, and it structure-forward presentation of vivacious acidity, crisp herbality, and savory fruit makes it an ideal wine for the table; any table, practically. I’ve tried our Carignanes with Indian curries, and come away dazzled. I’ve had them with Thai Green Curry, and loved the pairing. I’ve had our Carignanes with roasted tomatoes and fennel, and nearly fainted from an excess of pleasure. I’ve had our Carignanes with such a wide array of cuisines I’m tempted to go looking for an upscale version of the word “utilitarian” to describe it; upscale because utilitarian, while certainly indicating the wide array of culinary possibility this wine evidences, doesn’t seem to do justice to the grace with which it performs this service. Hmmmm…

Anyhow, the point is that Carignane, when given methodological respect, begets wines worthy of respect. I believe it, and it appears Eric Asimov believes it as well.

Do you? Come taste our 2007 Buchignani Ranch Carignane this weekend, so that I may welcome you to the fight!

Did Gary Vaynerchuk compare Ridge Geyserville to Big League Chew?

September 10, 2009

Q:

Did Gary Vaynerchuk just compare Ridge Geyserville to Big League Chew?

 

A:

Not exactly, but for what I imagine might be the first time ever, Big League Chew and Nerds both came up while discussing the 2006 Ridge Geyserville! The conversationalists in question were one Gary Vaynerchuk and one Jancis Robinson, and the setting was Wine Library TV. To read a lovely article about all the above, please follow this link  to Eric Asimov’s post (from this past Tuesday) on his wonderful New York Times-based blog The Pour. To see the original Wine Library TV episode where this all takes place, please click here.

Follow-Up On the 1977 Ridge York Creek Cabernet Sauvignon: Eric Asimov Reviews It In “The Pour!”

June 4, 2009

In a rather timely bit of synchronicity (see my previous post), it turns out that Eric Asimov discusses his very favorable reactions to tasting the 1977 RIDGE York Creek Cabernet Sauvignon in the June 1 edition of The Pour, to be found here in a great article entitled “The Elders Of California.” Wonderful timing Mr. Asimov, thank you!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 139 other followers

%d bloggers like this: