Posts Tagged ‘2005 Monte Bello’

10 Years Between Them: ’05 & ’95 Monte Bello

July 26, 2010

Had a lovely opportunity this past week to taste two Monte Bellos with ten years between them; the 2005 and the 1995.  

Siblings!

Siblings again!

 ’Twas fascinating to taste these side by side; in their own unique ways, they’re both quite structured, and both evidence a ripely sweetish character to the fruit. That said, the 05 seems the more muscular of the two, while the 95 is a tad more herbaceous. Birds of a feather certainly, but with key distinctions; the 05 seems somewhat more voluptuous, at least in terms of girth on the palate, but it’s not sensuous per se; rather, it’s intensely forward. This is a wine that pursues you, you do not pursue it. The 95, conversely, attracts you with a slyly supple come-on early, then retreats into comely mystery; here, you are the pursuer. 

And lastly, a mystery pic. Any ideas? It was taken during the tasting; that’s my only clue for you … 

The Mystery Pic ...

  

 

Robert Parker Scores Ridge!

March 4, 2010

 The February 2010 Issue of Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate has arrived, and in it is a wealth of commentary on a large portfolio of Ridge wines. And might I say, we fared rather well! Here are the scores:

  2003 Ridge Monte Bello 95+
  2004 Ridge Monte Bello 91
  2005 Ridge Monte Bello 97+
  2006 Ridge Monte Bello 94+
  2007 Ridge Monte Bello 92
  2008 Ridge Monte Bello (94-96)
  2005 Ridge Santa Cruz Mtns Estate Proprietary Red 92
  2006 Ridge Santa Cruz Mtns Estate Proprietary Red 91
  2007 Ridge Santa Cruz Mtns Estate Proprietary Red 88
  2007 Ridge Geyserville Proprietary Red Wine 91
  2008 Ridge Geyserville Proprietary Red Wine (90-92)
  2007 Ridge Lytton Springs Proprietary Red Wine 92
  2008 Ridge Lytton Springs Proprietary Red Wine (91-93)
  2007 Ridge Zinfandel East Bench 90+
  2008 Ridge Zinfandel East Bench (90-92)

 

97 points for the 2005 Monte Bello! Wow … And overall, that’s an average score of about 92 points. Not so very bad at all!

And for those of you who might be in the area this weekend, please note that we will be pouring the 2007 Lytton Springs (“It is a fuller-bodied, richer wine with beautiful texture, purity, and length”) and the 2007 Geyserville (“Medium to full-bodied, elegant, and pure”) in the Monte Bello Tasting Room, as well as the 2006 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate (“An attractive, round, rich, full-bodied mouthfeel, sweet tannin, and a long finish”), and should you wish to step up to our Monte Bello Tasting Flight, the 2006 Monte Bello! (“Well-balanced, dense, pure, layered, and rich”). That’s a 92 point flight right there …

AND, for those of you who are Monte Bello Collector Members who are planning to attend our member event this weekend, you’ll be tasting your newly-arrived 2007 Monte Bello! (And don’t forget the very special pre-release opportunity on the 2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate!)

Cheers to all, and a hearty toast to all at Mr. Parker’s publication for their kind words about our wines! And I would especially like to raise a glass to everyone on the production team here at Ridge; you make brilliant wines, and it’s wonderful to see the world responding with such positivity! Cheers! Cheers! Cheers!

Tasting Notes: 15-Vintage Monte Bello Vertical! (Milestone and Milestones!)

February 19, 2010

Well, this is a bit of a milestone post for what is still quite a young blog; it’s the 200th post! Accordingly, I want to do something a little special to mark the occasion, and this is what I have to offer:

I very recently had the astonishingly great pleasure of sitting at table with Paul Draper, Eric Baugher, David Gates, David Amadia, Nicole Buttitta, Karen Schmidt, and Shun Ishikubo of Ridge, and Guillaume Bienaime and John Sanders of the very fine restaurant Marché in Menlo Park, to taste through 15 vintages of Monte Bello! Needless to say, it was one of the more extraordinary tasting experiences of my life. My only regret is that we didn’t have all day to sip and savor! But this was work …

So, given the rigor and intensity of the tasting, combined with the unavoidable time constraint of a morning tasting on a workday, we had to move pretty seriously and rapidly through the offerings, and accordingly my notes are somewhat brief and a bit riffy, but I hope they give you at least a reasonably in-focus picture of what an utterly astonishing palate experience this was … sprinkled throughout are some observations from Eric Baugher as well, who very kindly gave me a copy of his notes as a resource.

We tasted the wines in groups, the first of which was a foursome comprised of the 2000, the 2002, the 2004, and the 2005 Monte Bellos. First though, for a proverbial wetting of the whistle, we sampled the 1999 Monte Bello Chardonnay. Mon Dieu! What a delicious wine!

1999 Monte Bello Chardonnay

Warm and nutty on the nose, with hints of caramel, butterscotch and vanilla, and a rich and complex tropicality. Mouthfilling and pleasantly viscous without being at all cloying. Mid-palate weight is intensified by strong minerality and a hint of bread-y yeastiness. The finish is long and woody, yet shows lots of bright acidity. Starting to develop secondary and tertiary maturation characteristics, but still delightfully youthful …

Ok, back to our inaugural foursome: 00, 02, 04, and 05 …

2000 Monte Bello

Elegant and playful, yet deeply concentrated, exhibiting bright notes of pomegranate and cranberry layered over a compellingly dark sub-strata redolent of cocoa, leather, fennel, and cigar-box; notable for the juxtaposition of weight and beauty, deep coloration and vibrant concentration …

2002 Monte Bello

Muscular, viscous, and tannin-forward, with rich notes of tar and earth coating a core of crisp bright red fruits and spicy dried fruits; cherry on the red side, black currant on the dried side … definitely youthful and fragrant, but notable for depth of both strength and length …

2004 Monte Bello

Minty and eucalyptal, with strong hints of cherry and menthol; very vibrant and herbaceous, with deep layers of cassis, leather, and tobacco … very elegant and complex, resolving nicely, and showing classic Monte Bello minerality …

2005 Monte Bello

Big, fruit-forward, and intensely structured, with a vast and complex array of fruit profiles brimming away in the bouquet and infusing the body … loads of mountain fruit character, led by a rich blueberry layer and followed by a delightful violet-laden florality … hints of cassis and blackberry, with a saturated peppering of clove and cardamom over nicely chalky tannins …

Not a bad way to lead off a flight, not by any stretch of the imagination! From there, we proceeded to our next foursome, this time a close look at some key vintages from the nineties: 1991, 1992, 1995, and 1997.

 

1991 Monte Bello

I’ve waxed rhapsodic about this vintage many times before, sometimes to almost embarrassing effect (dig this post!), and this tasting did nothing to dissuade me from the very firm conviction that my affections are most decidedly not misplaced. It’s just wonderful, a fully completed circle, every component perfectly placed, a ballet of integration, reconciliation, and harmony; ripe but tempered, complex yet approachable, dark but fruitful, buoyant yet earthy. A treat to taste …

1992 Monte Bello

Astonishingly complex aromatics, very expressive, with a rich perfume. Elegant but well-structured, with very juicy, concentrated fruit. Nicely compressed juxtapositions of licorice and violet, and cigar and pine. Very present acidity and lively fruits transition from a dense middle through to a long and enticing finish …

1995 Monte Bello

Very firmly structured, and defiantly structure-forward. A nice touch of earthiness, and big fruits paving the way for controlled and subtle acidity. Nice blend of forest floor and wet stone co-mingling with hints of cola and black licorice, making for an overall powerful and complex offering …

1997 Monte Bello

Showing remarkably youthful still, and still opening up accordingly. Fully structure-forward, and still flexing its impending complexities … Starting to develop deep mountain fruit characteristics amongst the already present Monte Bello minerality, and clearly heading for a deep and seductive mid-palate around a nicely earthy core …

This foursome was followed by what I think we all collectively agreed was the surprise grouping of the bunch, a five-wine vertical of 80′s era Monte Bello: 1981, 1984, 1985, 1988, ands 1989. I say surprise because this decade as a whole has suffered some disparagement in the past, but to our collective palates, this was easily the most difficult group to pull favorites from; they all showed magnificently!

 

1981 Monte Bello

Deep, deep notes of fudge, chocolate, and cocoa, below an nearly-as-dark-layer of tar and chipotle, sewed together with a decadent chord of umami notes. Loads of black fruits, firm tannins, and still-lively acidity, and showing secondary and tertiary characteristics redolent of balsamic and molasses …

1984 Monte Bello

A very pleasant mintiness on the nose, with lots of red fruits and a hint of menthol and eucalyptus. A near feral intensity to the fruit layers, dominated by an almost sweet cherry character. Intense, pungent, and powerful, with great structure and length …

1985 Monte Bello

Woodsy, and very complexly so, with hints of caramel, vanilla, and cream blending with a slight citricity to almost evoke a caramel apple, wooden stick and all … Tremendously bright and youthful acidity, very fresh and young, with a subdued yet complex bouquet followed by a creamy blue-fruit laden middle and an herb-and-spice laden finish …

1988 Monte Bello

Archetypal “old-world” aromatics showing a concentrated mosaic of black cherry, cola, cedar, leather, and earth, with a concentrated mid-palate blending wild mountain fruit and exotic spice; perfectly resolved and structured, with still-youthful acidity and tannin …

1989 Monte Bello

Lots of fascinating structural components on offer, including dried currant, olive, and tobacco on the nose, and cedar, clove, and anise at entry. Complex without being weighty, with multiple layers of mineral, spice, and sweeter fruits mid-palate, closing with a firm and structure-forward finish …

The final grouping was a two-wine group, and this was really the treat of the bunch, both for the rarity, and the caliber! We first tasted the 1978 Monte Bello, and then the 1968! Unbelievable …

 

1978 Monte Bello

Decadent hints of stew, blood, and iodine simmering in the aromatics, meaning meaty, but not in an umami way, more Wellington-esque … Wonderful second and third tier characteristics on display, including clove, sandalwood, tobacco, and cedar, modulating sweet and concentrated fruits into an earthy and complex body, finishing very lively and vigorous …

1968 Monte Bello

Just astonishing, a 42-year-old wine, and yet still showing so much power, complexity, and concentration. Lots of classic mountain minerality, dried fruits, and sweet sauce notes (plum and balsamic), with a structurally enticing duskiness foreshadowing a rustic mid-palate, and closing with a completed-circle reappearance of marrow-like notes couched in a wrap of sandalwood and cigar …

And that was it for the tasting. I don’t think I’ll ever forget it. And while I recognize that the purchase of an older-vintage Monte Bello is not an every day investment, I heartily encourage you all to find a way to sample some of the these older vintages, whether through purchases, or via one of the special tastings that we host in our tasting rooms., It’s an experience that will not leave you for a long, long time …

And thank you to the powers that be for letting me be a part of such an extraordinary tasting!

Contemporary Tasting Notes On Multiple Monte Bellos!

January 11, 2010

If you’re interested in perusing an interesting and contemporary set of tasting notes on Monte Bello vintages from 1992, 1994, and 1996, you can take a virtual stroll over to the Spirit of ’76 website and have a read; the notes are posted here: 

Monte Bello Vintage Pack 

And for a very nice summary, in tasting note form, of an event hosted by Paul Draper at Mirabelle restaurant in Austin, in which the 90, 91, 92, and 03 vintages of Monte Bello were tasted (along with several other Ridge offerings), check out: 

The Good Taste Report 

And definitely take a trip over to Vine Arts for a look at their Top Wines of the Year, which happens to include some lovely comments about the 2005, the 1996, and the 1987 vintages. Here is the post: 

2009 Year In Review 

And here’s another year-end summary of wines in 2009, featuring the 2005 Monte Bello, written by Geoff Last for the Calgary Herald: 

Top Ten Wines of 2009 

And lastly, head over to our friends at Slaked for notes on the 1984! 

SLAKED!  

Cheers!

Tasting Notes On A Mini-Vertical: 2005 Monte Bello & 1995 Monte Bello; In Rhyme!

October 12, 2009

Preparing for a vertical of two,
A decade separating their debut.

Delicious Monte Bello cabernet,
And I in search of something fine to say.

I sit before two perfect crystal glasses,
reflecting on my luck amongst the masses.

Peculiar, that this lot in life be mine;
paid to drink, and write of drinking wine!

My greed for tasting is of course supplanted
by patience, that they both be twice decanted.

And that now being true, I shall begin
with the ’05, then its decade older twin.

The nose is deep with earth and blackened spice
and bread from flour of fine chinese black rice.

Impenetrable hues of deepest scarlet
with ruby tones, and highlights ripe with garnet.

Returning, once again, to aromatics,
I savor playful berries most emphatic.

On the palate, there’s acidity most buoyant,
and I must name Mr. Baugher a clairvoyant,

for he surely looked through future’s open door
when he predicted cellaring for decades more!

Here soft acidity is elegantly coupled
with tannins strong yet elegantly supple,

giving structure of a type I must call stellar,
now back you go, ’05, into the cellar!

With wisdom of the ages, the ’95
awaits my youthful palate to arrive.

With nervousness, the glass, I shyly fumble,
a mendicant for sure, and surely humble.

As to a holy man the mendicant draws close,
up to the waiting glass, I bring my nose,

and drawing in the air of life so deep,
I strive to stave off some strange need to weep;

not tears of sadness, mind you, nor of grief,
but rather with the freedom of relief,

for this, this smell, a freedom near-pelagic,
has oft enlaced my dreams with its sweet magic.

Sweetness, depth, complexity, orated,
are merely words, but these concentrated

strains of decadence that play as I imbibe
are a magic that a word cannot describe.

Rusticity and elegance, sewn together
in a tapestry of herb and spice and leather

with a garnishing of fruits most celebrated –
berry, cherry, plum — all complicated

by strains of semi-bitter cocoa powder
and a touch of smoke that sings ever so louder.

If perfection is a moment fixed in time,
then surely now’s a perfect time to taste this wine!

So, with gratitude I draw this to a close,
satisfied on tongue and in my nose,

and lastly, let it surely be once said,
that wine and poetry are meant to wed!

And if wine to this poet be a wife,
then may the fates grant this young marriage a long life!

And if the poet be a fine and noble fellow
then may the fates bless his heart with Monte Bello!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers