Archive for the ‘Vintage Wine Labels’ Category

A Parade of Rarities …

June 16, 2011

A trio of us here at Ridge/Monte Bello were fortunate participants recently in an event of unexpected reverence, decadence, and untamed historical significance.

It was a Saturday evening. The few scarves of sun that remained wrapped around the neck of the day had given way to the blue fleece of dusk; faint rays slalomed over the pale powders that crept up the bobbled landslides of the mountain as faint tendrils of fog Grinch-fingered their way between the coarse limestone fractures.

The heaters had been warming up the Old Winery Barn for several hours, and the lingering heat from the times when the sun had blanched the windows still remained. Every chair, as it unfolded, sent a creak around the rafters, every table leg that landed sounded shots across the beams. As the tablecloths were dropped, and softly pressed against their structures, one could start to sense the gathering to come. Finally, it was done, every glass buffed to perfection, every water pitcher filled, and in the trench behind the bar, all the tools soon to be called on, all the Ah Sos and the Double-Stops, the pullers and the strainers, the decanters and the funnels …

The barn was empty, we were ready …

It began just like a party always does, a lot of talking, idle drinking, social planets, misaligned, finally coming into orbit, but the sun and its trajectory made mincemeat of it all, of the watches, all the gold ones and the silver’d, in the pockets, on the wrists; no time for talking, what’s this wood crate on the bar?!?!?!?!?

What’s this wood crate on the bar?!?!?!?!

And now, we say poetry, Godspeed ye on your way, for now’s no time for words; wicked prose, begone, ye idler of time!

To borrow a phrase from a guest in attendance, it’s time to “geek out” on the wine …

So, what was it in that wood crate on the bar? The centerpiece of the evening. A 6 liter bottle of …

of …

of 1968 Monte Bello!

What is that wood crate on the bar?!?!?!?!?!?!?

 
Yours truly was called on to open and decant. The role of a lifetime. Under the intensest of scrutinies, I went to work. Spelunker in the sediments of 1968. Inch by inch, row by row, tool by tool, I was making it. A crumble here, a nudge there. Movement, then no movement. I was sweating. Finally, some 25 minutes later, I was done. The wine lay there, in decanters of many shapes and sizes, tasting its first lungfuls of the cool mountain air since being genie’d to the bottle over 40 years ago. It looked magnificent. It was royal, it was holy. We were thirsty.
 

Hello. Hello again.

But is it really “thirst” one feels when one is facing such a wine? Certainly it’s not the thirst of a parched throat, a grumbling stomach. Perhaps the thirst of a mendicant in the desert of one’s mind, seeking answers to a koan never answered? Or is it just flat-out greed, the wish to taste that which has never been tasted, the desire to own an experience that, once felt, cannot be claimed by any other. God only knows, but we were thirsty!
 
I am ashamed to admit how little of the taste I can recall now. The experiential was almost too much to bear, too much to conceive. How, when tasting a wine with this kind of history writ into its very DNA, could one possibly resort to platitudes of the “nice, round tannins, mid-tone fruit, lovely cedar, just a hint of a clove and anise” sort? Answer? One can’t. Because you don’t TASTE a wine like this, you RELIVE a wine like this, as if you’re falling off a cliff, and life in its entirely is passing by your eyes. You RELIVE a life you never even had. You RELIVE the life we ALL have had; to drink a wine like this is to tap into the Dundesian Collective Unconsciousness, the shared folklore of all human-hood.
 
I could tell you about some of the other wonderful, surprising, stunning wines we prepared and tasted that night. Like the other 1968 contribution, the Ruby Cabernet …
 
 
Or the now-legendary 1970 Occidental Late Harvest Zinfandel …
 
 
Or the 1975 Geyserville (truly outstanding!) …
 
 
 
Or the 1979 York Creek Cabernet Sauvignon, which, from a “normal” tasting standpoint, was in its own way kind of the wine of the night …
 
 
But truly, with the hallowed ghosts of the Old Winery Barn as my witnesses, I will never forget that 6 liter bottle of 1968 Monte Bello.
 
To you (and you know who you are!) I thank you. On behalf of my colleagues and myself, who had no expectations other than to host an evening event, I thank you. For adding our names to an exalted list in the books of Ridge history, I thank you. Simply, I thank you.
 
 
 
 
 

Double Monte Bello Vertical Opportunity!

May 19, 2011

If you’re not yet a Monte Bello Collector member, now might REALLY be a good time to just take that plunge.

Why?

It’s the Final Assemblage Tasting this weekend, and if you sign up NOW, you can still attend!

What exactly does that mean? Well, I could wax ad infinitum about the 2010 Monte Bello (what a vintage!), and I could certainly sing endless praises for Fatted Calf Charcuterie, Gayle’s Bakery, and Cowgirl Creamery (all of whom will be offering their wares at the event!), but even more than all that, we are SERIOUSLY laying it on from the wine side, in terms of the additional treats on offer. Doubt me? Dig THIS!

A DOUBLE MONTE BELLO VERTICAL OPPORTUNITY!

First, 2005 and 1995 Monte Bello, side by side!

–then–

1977 and 2007 Monte Bello, side by side!

Yes, that’s right. That’s not a typo, that is 1977. NINETEEN SEVENTY-SEVEN!

Do you realize that’s the same year that both Fleetwood Mac’s “Rumours” and The Sex Pistol’s “Never Mind The Bollocks” came out? I mean, c’mon!

Doubt me? Dig THIS!

Just tasted the 1977 about an hour ago …

Remarkable (and admittedly unexpected!) cohesion of color; some evolution, certainly; meaning, some bricking and cranberry, but still a lovely mid-tone plum belly …

Loads of dried fruit on the nose, plus a bevy of black herb shades; hints of tanned leather and anise, some menthol & dry mineral; even some Japanese pickled plum …

Still dense and concentrated on the palate, yet with a pillowy effluence … Tannins are fully and excellently resolved, with some subtle traces of acidity still bouncing; these both emerge a bit stronger in the finish …

Primary fruit is of course largely diminished, as appropriate for a wine of this maturation level, but there is such a lovely delicacy afoot, with multiple layers of secondary and tertiary herb and spice and dried fruit notes, that this just HAS to be tasted NOW! (For the arch archivists amongst you, you can see my notes from a previous tasting of this extraordinary vintage here).

Meaning, much Dig, Dig, and Digging to be done. And Dig THIS; 1977 Monte Bello, The Mini-Movie …

Monte Bello Library Tasting: Tasting Notes!

October 11, 2010

Well, it’s only the second weekend of our special new Monte Bello Library Tasting, so we’re still in the early pleasurable throes of learning, re-learning, discovering and re-discovering these vintages (1994, 1992, 1992, in 375ml), but I thought I’d give a little run-down on our collective internal consensus (meaning; the generalized, centralized, and codified co-consensae of the MBTR staff) to date:

1994 Monte Bello (375ml)

The astonishing thing about the 1994 is that, despite the age of the wine (14 years in the bottle!) and the bottle format (faster maturation in the smaller format), it’s actually still showing quite young; almost adolescent even. It’s very structure forward, with firm tannins and bright acidity front and center. The nose is youthfully funky, compressed, and dense, while the mouthfeel is comparatively lean and spicy; all aspects of the profile are showing quite deliciously, but the overall melodocism is still en route from discordance to harmony–this is a fascinating and tasty peek at a slow-moving, tremendously complex vintage, that is undeniably going to keep offering rewards for years to come.

1992 Monte Bello (375ml)

Of the trio, the 1992 is currently showing as the most elegant of the three; the mouthfeel is utterly silken, the acidity is brightly interwoven, the tannins are refined and subtle, and the fruit is seamlessly integrated with the structural components. By comparison, the ’92 is showing as a quieter wine, cool jazz rather than hot, zen brush & ink as opposed to abstract expressionism; the movement across the palate is gentle, graceful, gracious, and delicate. Still showing slightly to the young side, but very much beginning to approach a finessed resolution.

1991 Monte Bello (375ml)

Well, to date the 1991 is still holding fast to its top-of-the-pops reputation; there is just no getting around the fact that this is an extraordinary vintage, and to taste it at this point — 17 years in a 375ml!– is an extraordinary palate experience, a real proof-of-concept moment as regards ageability and the Monte Bello. In addition to its notable longevity, the vintage exhibits an astonishing and singular flavor profile: so dense, so compressed, so concentrated; the purity and decadence of the fruit is almost too much for the palate to bear. One can only withstand the sensually oenophilic equivalent of goosebumps for so long … A fittingly stunning coda to a gleefully stunning tasting.

One of THOSE days at Monte Bello!

September 13, 2010

Somtimes the dice are with you, sometimes they’re not.

Some days you get people trying to smoke cigarettes on the property (a big no no!), or trying to drink beer (another big no no!). Or someone brings a dog (unfortunately, not allowed), or parks a limo in one of the disabled parking spaces (another no no).

Some days, someone comes in, and apologizes for having just clogged one of the toilets.

Sometimes, you go to open an umbrella on the deck, and a swarm of bats flies out and scares you out of your wits. Or you go for an early morning walk through the vines, and you hear the ol’ familiar rattle (do note, the Beware Of Rattlesnake signs are real! No grass angels in the gardens!).

Some days, you forget and wear a light colored shirt to work, and you open a wine with a little too much gusto, and, well, there goes your shirt. And then you spend the rest of the day walking around looking like an extra from a mob movie; Whacked Guy #2.

But other days, people bring wine in, and they share it with you.

It’s just not everyday that you get to try a 1997 Jimsomare Cabernet AND a 1982 Devil’s Hill Petite Sirah all on the same day:

97 Jimsomare Cab in the bottle ...

...97 Jimsomare Cab in the glass!

The Devil's Hill ...

... and The Devil's Cork!

Special thanks to Bing Tsai and Craig Gleason for sharing their wines!

The French Laundry Cometh …

July 26, 2010

Had such a fine time today! We very happily hosted the extraordinary wine team from the impossibly fine French Laundry today; wonderful, wonderful guests, and dare I say it, wonderful, wonderful wines. Such a treat to have them here, it was an absolute pleasure to host. And what a spread of wine! Couldn’t imagine more pleasant company to share these offerings with, and I hope our guests enjoyed the opportunity to be on the receiving end of the hospitality endeavor; lord knows they’re committed to providing it, I hope we were able to offer at least a modicum of payback. Special cheers to our VP of Vineyard Operations David Gates for his exceptional touring and hosting, and a heartfelt thank you to our guests; for their participation in The French Laundry’s timeless contribution to California’s culinary legacy, and of course for their support of our wines!

As to the wines themselves, here is the rundown of what we tasted:

2008 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay
2006 Monte Bello Chardonnay

2008 Lytton Springs (not yet released)
2008 PaganiRanch (not yet released)
2008 York Creek (not yet released)

2008 Geyserville
2008 East Bench
2008 Paso Robles
2008 Ponzo

1999 Geyserville
1999 Lytton Springs

2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Cabernet/Merlot (375ml)
2007 Monte Bello (not yet released/375ml)
2006 Monte Bello (375ml)

1988 Monte Bello
1990 Monte Bello
1995 Monte Bello (375ml)

For myself, quite a day. Thelong  journey from here …

… to there!

Julia Child and Paul Draper!

July 23, 2010

“Mmmmm, that is a wine, but how did you do it?” 

A sleekly striking black-and-chrome grille pulls in to the sound of tinny parlor piano; cut to a pristine cream flower arrangement, and the sparkle of a cocktail party reflected in a gilded mirror. 

As the camera pans in, we discover to where we’ve been transported; it’s an invitation to Dinner at Julia’s. An invitation to table, an invitation back in time. Checked sportcoats and mustaches abound as Julia herself lopes to center-screen with that singular combination of confidence and ungainliness that helped make her so beloved to so many. As that queerly pitched and somewhat strangled (yet somehow sonorously pure and delightful!) voice begins to sound out, welcoming us to what promises to be a delightful duck dinner (christened “Designer Duck”), the camera cuts to guest #1 — Chef Yves Labbe — who can be seen gesticulating firmly with index finger in the air, no doubt weighing in on some culinary debate of great importance, as Julia describes the dish he has prepared. 

As Julia introduces guest number #2, the camera bring us in, then up, in tandem with the northern sweep of a wine glass, as it carries its precious liquid onto the palate of none other than Paul Draper himself; striking in goatee and decidedly lengthy sideburns; crisply pointed collar, perfectly assembled tie. 

Cut to a new scene; seated in easy chairs laid out in front of wine racks, their conversation begins with Julia rubbing her hands together excitedly, and asking, “Paul, what have you brought us?” 

Julia Child & Paul Draper

As they talk on about the dishes to be served and the wines Paul has selected, Julia clearly delights in the conundrum she’s pitched Paul to pair; artichokes with lobster! Older zinfandels? For the most part, “too rich, and too full.” The solution? 1977 Paso Robles, a “light vintage” that provides “good acidity” and good “clarity of character.” Julia giggles with pleasure. 

Paul continues on, describing the Monte Bello, his choice for the the duck entrée. Julia interrupts, “Can we taste it?” Paul pours. She sniffs. “Mmmmm, that is a wine, but how did you do it?” 

To find out the answer to this question, and to find out what Paul selected to pair with dessert — crepes & strawberries; and to hear Julia announce the Monte Bello at table, and to see Chef Yves Labbe applaud, and to enjoy the aerial shot of the pre-meal toast, you’ll have to watch the whole film. Enjoy! 

To see more videos from Ridge Vineyards, please visit the Ridge Vineyards YouTube Channel.

A 1964 Ridge Cabernet Sauvignon Just Walked Into Our Tasting Room!

May 2, 2010

Ok, it didn’t actually walk in, at least not by itself. It came in the company of my new two favorite people in the world,  Judi Rosenthal and Peter Dalena. What wondrous folks! They drove all the way up the mountain to share this outstanding rarity with our Monte Bello Tasting Room staff, and we can’ t thank them enough!

Did I mention this was a 1964 Ridge Cabernet Sauvignon?

That’s a 46-year-old wine, in case you’re counting …

And the color …

Was beautiful!

And to give credit where credit is due, here is a snapshot of our lovely benefactors!

And just in case you’d like to watch the tasting action live, here’s a bit of video for you (I think Tara’s reaction at the end pretty much sums up all our feelings; the wine was still tasting wondrously!)

Outliving Longevity Projections: The 1973 Geyserville

March 24, 2010

Today was another one of those great days when into my inbox comes a heartfelt and wondrous story about one of our wines, and how it found its way through the mists of time into someone else’s life. These moments are always a reminder of just how far a wine can travel, how significant a role it can play, and how even more magical it can make an already magical moment. And sometimes, it’s just plain great news to hear that a wine has simply withstood the trials of time. Add to the latter an excellent food pairing suggestion, and you’ve got in a nutshell the letter I’ve just received.

It begins:

“We had our last bottle of the ’73 Geyserville last night at a dinner party and it was great. Still plenty of fruit, good color and all the satisfaction that comes with drinking a well made mature wine.”

Mind you, I received this letter TODAY, and the letter references LAST NIGHT, meaning this was a 36+ year-old-wine! Astonishing for any wine, but all the more so for … gasp! … A California Zinfandel! Our writer actually has quite a little fun at Paul’s expense, who wrote the label notes in 1975, and gave a rather humble projection of longevity:

“The label said that we should wait at least three years before drinking the wine, but the extra 33 years didn’t hurt.”

Excellent! I love it!

The letter continues with a reference to what was had at table as a companion to this wine, and if ever a finer pairing was offered for a vintage Geyserville, I’d like to hear it!

“We had the wine with onion soup and steak frites maitre d’hotel from Thomas Keller’s Bouchon cookbook.”

The letter concludes with quite a touching line meant for Paul Draper, and it’s a sentiment I’d like to second:

“Thanks for making a great wine.”

Thanks indeed Paul, and thanks to you-know-who-you-are for writing us such a wonderful letter!

Around The Word With Ridge Wine -or- How A 1989 Bradford Mountain Traveled From Maui, to Washington, to Texas, and to Tennessee, And How It’s Tasting Now! (Hint: Great!)

October 28, 2009

I’ve received another one of THOSE e-mails again, one of those great, wonderful, touching, inspiring, gratifying e-mails in which someone shares an amazing story about one of our wines. These time, a lovely customer by the name of Marti is the sender, and here is what she wrote:

“Several years ago, we had been given as gifts, a 1989 Ridge California Cabernet Bradford Mountain and a 1992 Ridge California Cabernet York Creek. We always meant to open these wines but somehow, never did so. Over the years, these bottles moved with us to Maui, Washington, Texas and now, Tennessee. Last night, thinking that the 1989 Cab was now surely vinegar we opened it and in a word, it was marvelous. Full-bodied, berry and oak infused, it was delicious. Thought you would like to know.”

You’re darn right we’d like to know! What a wonderful story! And I have to say, this is particularly gratifying to hear, given the existence of some past critical assessments of this wine that were slightly less than favorable regarding this offering’s potential for longevity. Take that, wine critics! 20 years later, and it’s “marvelous”! I love it! (Even Paul Draper himself only gave this wine a 12-year development window!)

Thanks so much to Marti for sharing her story, and to all of you out there, keep the wine tales coming!

89CBM

2002 Stone Ranch: New Tasting Notes For A Vintage Wine!

October 12, 2009

One of the real joys of my job here at Ridge/Monte Bello is reading the wonderful e-mails that come through our inbox chronicling the experiences that people have had with our wines. Sometimes heartwarming, sometime instructive, always appreciated, together these correspondences comprise a jigsaw puzzle that, when assembled, paints a beautiful picture of the roles our wines play in people’s lives.

I always appreciate the opportunity to read these mails, and I am particularly pleased when individuals agree to let me post their thoughts and comments for our readers to enjoy. Today is one such occasion when it is my great pleasure to share an experience enjoyed by one Gregory Frank, a Ridge customer who recently tasted not one but two bottles of our 2002 Stone Ranch.

02ZSR1-L

For those of you who may not be familiar with this wine, this was actually quite an important release, as it was the debut of the Stone Ranch designation! Only 40 barrels were made, and it was not distributed to retail or restaurant accounts; rather, it was only made available through our ATP Wine Club, adding even more cachet to this already quite exclusive offering.

The Stone Ranch vineyards are located on the western edge of Alexander Valley, near the Geyserville vineyards, and are surrounded by river rocks tilled from the soil over many years. It’s a warm day-cool night microclimate, with very gravelly soil, and the zinfandel vines there were planted in 1988 and 1994.

When Paul Draper wrote the label notes for this wine in December of 2003, his prediction for longevity and development was a year or two of bottle age for softening, and an additional 3 or so years to achieve full development. So in theory, based on Paul’s prediction, the wine should have peaked nearly a year ago.

However, I am happy to report that does not appear to be the case! After tasting through two bottles, Gregory wrote the following:

“I just drank my second 2002 Stone Ranch Zinfandel. What a wonderful wine. Perfectly balanced and drinking beautifully. This is an elegant wine.”

So if anyone out there is holding on to any bottles of this wine, it sounds to me like it might be a good time to pull the cork on one!

Cheers to Gregory for sending his thoughts across, and cheers to the 2002 Stone Ranch! Anyone else tasted this wine recently? Enquiring minds want to know!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 69 other followers