Archive for the ‘Petite Sirah’ Category

One of THOSE days at Monte Bello!

September 13, 2010

Somtimes the dice are with you, sometimes they’re not.

Some days you get people trying to smoke cigarettes on the property (a big no no!), or trying to drink beer (another big no no!). Or someone brings a dog (unfortunately, not allowed), or parks a limo in one of the disabled parking spaces (another no no).

Some days, someone comes in, and apologizes for having just clogged one of the toilets.

Sometimes, you go to open an umbrella on the deck, and a swarm of bats flies out and scares you out of your wits. Or you go for an early morning walk through the vines, and you hear the ol’ familiar rattle (do note, the Beware Of Rattlesnake signs are real! No grass angels in the gardens!).

Some days, you forget and wear a light colored shirt to work, and you open a wine with a little too much gusto, and, well, there goes your shirt. And then you spend the rest of the day walking around looking like an extra from a mob movie; Whacked Guy #2.

But other days, people bring wine in, and they share it with you.

It’s just not everyday that you get to try a 1997 Jimsomare Cabernet AND a 1982 Devil’s Hill Petite Sirah all on the same day:

97 Jimsomare Cab in the bottle ...

...97 Jimsomare Cab in the glass!

The Devil's Hill ...

... and The Devil's Cork!

Special thanks to Bing Tsai and Craig Gleason for sharing their wines!

Zinfandel: The Art of the Blend!

August 21, 2010

If you’re anywhere in the area of either our tasting rooms today, and if you have any interest in Zinfandel, I think we may have a little something special on offer for you. It’s the third edition of our Summer Wine Series for 2010, and for today’s theme, we’ve selected “Zinfandel: The Art of the Blend.” And what we’ve put together for a tasting flight, is, I think, a rather uniquely educational opportunity to experience the full range of what this oft-misunderstood varietal truly has to give.

What we’ve done is put four wines together, and staged them as a progression of blending varietal expressions; meaning, the first wine is solo-varietal zinfandel, the next has one varietal in the blend, the next two, and the next three. The specific wines we’ve selected are as follows:

2008 Paso Robles
—Zinfandel—

Vines ripened uniformly, and we harvested all three parcels within a week—a record.  Primary fermentation was carried out by natural yeasts. Juice was pumped over the cap twice daily until pressing—day eight, on average. Uninoculated secondary fermentation took forty days. The finished lots were blind-tasted for assemblage; for once, all could be included. Exotic barrel spices complement the vineyard’s ripe bramble fruit, and this year’s intense color is striking. Integrated and enjoyable now, this excellent vintage will develop over the next five to seven years. EB (8/09)

2008 Ponzo
—Zinfandel & Petite Sirah—

Cool spring weather delayed budbreak, but flowering and fruit set were complete by early June, and a warm summer ripened the grapes fully by early September. The grapes all fermented on their natural yeasts for twelve days, on average. After natural malolactic, we racked the new wine to american oak barrels, fifteen percent of which were new. Rich and full-bodied, the 2008 Ponzo is nonetheless elegant—a zinfandel to be enjoyed over the next five to seven years.  JO (11/09)

 

2007 Lytton Springs

—Zinfandel, Petite Sirah, & Carignane—

After a dry winter and spring, budbreak came early. A warm August ripened the fruit earlier than expected, and we harvested the thirty-four parcels as flavors developed fully, fermenting each separately on its natural yeasts. Aged for fifteen months in air-dried american oak, this classic Lytton Springs is remarkable for its richness, balance, and elegant texture. It will soften and gain complexity over the next ten years. JO (11/08)

2008 Geyserville
—Zinfandel, Petite Sirah, Carignane, & Mataro—

In tank, color and tannin extraction was unusually rapid, as were uninoculated primary fermentations. We reduced pump-overs and pressed early, avoiding harsher tannins. Zinfandel and carignane showed exceptional quality, and form the core of the blend. (Wines from the petite sirah parcels were too tannic; the six percent included comes from a field-blend.)  Twenty percent new oak adds exotic spice. Superb concentration and firm acid will allow this fine zinfandel to develop over the next ten to fifteen years. EB (11/09)

And if that wasn’t enough, we’ve capping this tasting with a sample of our 2006 Monte Bello, and our 2007 Geyserville Essence!

2006 Monte Bello

Summer was unusually warm; picking began on September 18, ahead of schedule. Though a cool October slowed ripening, all parcels were harvested within five weeks, and natural yeasts started the primary within three days. Uninoculated secondary began in tank; eighty percent of the thirty-six lots were racked to barrel for completion. Thirteen were selected for the first assemblage in late January. Additions of petit verdot and cabernet franc contributed depth. Balanced and elegant now, this exceptional vintage has the structure to carry it for twenty-five years or more. EB (3/08)

2007 Geyserville Essence

We made our first Zinfandel Essence from Geyserville in 1966. To produce an essence, the vines must remain vigorous late into the season, with green leaves for photosynthesis. To intensify color and concentrate sugar, the grapes were left on the vine for three additional weeks; they co-fermented on natural yeasts. To our delight, the initial Brix reading was beyond the hydrometer’s ability to measure. It took five days for the yeast to begin fermentation, another five days to stop naturally—fully stable. The wine aged in air-dried american oak barrels; clarity was achieved through careful racking. Opulent and full-flavored, the 2007 Essence can be enjoyed now and over the next twenty years. EB (9/08)

So, if you can, come join us!

First Friday Blind-Tasting: We Have A Winner!

August 9, 2010

For our First Friday event this past weekend, we hosted a rather unusual blind tasting for our guests. We poured three sets of two wines each side-by-side, and in each case, one wine was a Z-List wine, and one was an ATP wine, and there was a link between the two. The job of our tasters was to guess the vintage, the varietal, and the designation of each wine. To assist in this rather challenging task, we provided a hint for each pair. The first hint was “Alexander Valley,” the second was “Sub-Parcel Harvesting,” and the third was “Blend vs. Solo-Varietal.”

The first pair was the 2007 Carmichael Zinfandel and the 2007 Geyserville Zinfandel, with the link being that the vineyards are both located in Alexander Valley. The second pair was the 2006 Lytton Springs Zinfandel and the 2006 Lytton Estate Zinfandel, with the link being that the Lytton Estate offering is made up of just a few parcels from the larger Lytton Springs property (sub-parcel harvesting). The final pair was the 2006 York Creek and the 2006 Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah, with the  link being that the York Creek is a blend of zinfandel, and petite sirah from the Dynamite Hill block, and the Dynamite Hill itself is solo-varietal petite sirah (blend vs. solo-varietal).

So how did our guests do? Quite well actually, especially given the overall difficulty of blind tastings in general! There was a total of 21 points available, 1 point for each correct vintage, varietal, and designation, and 1 bonus point for getting both wines in the pair fully correct.

And here are the results:

Third Place: Nancy Hom and John Ronald (tie)

Second Place: Danielle Johnston, John Kirkwood, and David & Tracy McLaughlin (tie)

And all alone in first place, a hearty congratulations to:

Kathleen Dowling!!! You’re our First Friday Blind Tasting Winner!!!

Thanks to all our guests for participating, and to all our winners listed above we say, please come back and see us in the tasting rooms, we’d love the chance to honor you in person!

Essence!

August 7, 2010

Because we’re pouring Essence in our tasting rooms today, in rather unprecedented fashion (as part of our Summer Wine Series), I thought it appropriate to pull a little behind-the-scenes treat for the staff … palate calibration, you know. I call this “Still-Life With Essence”

Still Life With Essence

On Field Blends

August 6, 2010

The subject of field blends tends to come up with some degree of frequency in conversations about wine, and it rather oddly seems to be doing so with a somewhat greater rate just lately. I suspect it has something to do with the seemingly ever-present (and perhaps increasing?) tension between what are oft considered to be competing schools of thought as regards the production of wine, with one side being perceived as (or self-identifying as) “traditionalists” engaging in the practice of “natural” winemaking, and the other side being “modernists” who have embraced technology and its associated contemporary methodologies in pursuit of their winemaking goals, and who have accordingly often abandoned certain other approaches as being outmoded. Numerous practices become subject to judgments of a sort when the debates are framed thusly, and this seems a likely cause for the controversy surrounding field blends.

Put simply, a field blend is a wine comprised of the juice of more than one type of grape (i.e. a “blend”), in which said blended grapes are actually planted together in the same vineyard. In short, they are blended in “the field,” as opposed to being blended in the winery. Many of the older-vine properties in Northern California are planted in this fashion; an archetypal old-vine California vineyard might be planted primarily to zinfandel, with small plantings of carignane and petite sirah inter-planted amongst the zinfandel vines.

I had recent cause to assemble some thoughts on the subject of field blends, courtesy of a very fascinating article that was posted on Tom Wark’s very excellent “Fermentation: The Daily Wine Blog.” Initially, I had planned only to offer a written response to the article (and the ensuing comments) by posting a comment myself, which I did, but in the weeks since, as the question of field blends has continued to come across my radar, it occurred to me to put up a post of my own, based on what I wrote on Tom’s site (if you’re not already reading his blog, I encourage you to do so. In addition to the consistently fine articles, the comment sections are truly a wonder. The article I responded to featured, among others, comments from the likes of Steve Heimoff, Charlie Olken, and Joel Peterson!). What follows is essentially a mini-manifesto of sorts, attempting to explain Ridge’s devotion to, and continued production of, field-blended wines, and offering up our Geyserville and Lytton Springs wines as key examples of type.

The reasons for our dedication to a field-blend model are numerous, and run the gamut from rather more abstract philosophical stances to more tangible factors related to taste and quality. But in the end, I think it’s safest to say that the field-blend model is part-and-parcel with Ridge’s fundamental commitment to honoring the true character of any given vineyard to the best of our ability. Ridge is (save for one exception) a single-vineyard producer, fundamentally dedicated to practicing a (choose your term) non-interventionist/minimum-impact set of methodologies in both the vineyard and the winery, in hopes of capturing all the singularities that make up the full expression of a particular vineyard; the field-blend concept being but one component in an over-arching spread of decisions made to reflect this commitment. Integrated Pest Management, Beneficial Crop Cover, Irrigation Management, Reduced Tillage, Compositing and Recyling, etc. are all examples of this fundamental philosophy in action. The point being is that every vineyard we work with has its own unique set of characteristics — microclimate, soil types, vine age and history, topography, etc. — and by trying to “intervene” as little as possible, we hope to accordingly ultimately craft a wine that is unique to its vineyard. So, by this reasoning, if the vineyard is planted as a field blend, then the wine we make will be a field blend.

There is of course tremendous market pressure out there demanding vintage-to-vintage consistency, but for our purposes, this kind of consistency cannot possibly be honest to the vineyards; Mother Nature does not repeat herself, so neither should her wines. Via the single-vineyard methodology, however, I think a wonderful kind of consistency is more than achievable. For example, Ridge’s Geyserville (a field blend) may change year to year, but it always tastes like Geyserville, and accordingly, unlike any other wine out there. This is, to my way of thinking, a sort of holy grail intersection of terroir and the marketplace; integrity as regards representing the vineyard, integrity as regards representing the brand.

All the concerns raised about field blends (uneven ripening being the most common) are certainly at least arguably valid, but just because something is difficult to manage shouldn’t mean it isn’t pursued, and to suggest that field blends can’t possibly attain greatness would seem to fly in the face of the long-term and fairly legendary success of a great many Californian wines; I like to think of both Geyserville and Lytton Springs being in that category, and it would seem there is at least some degree of support for that faith. Not that the critical intelligentsia working in the world of wine should be seen as be-all/end-all barometers of quality, but if we can take it as a safe assumption that Parker/Laube/Tanzer/Dias Blue/Robinson et al have achieved their prominence via some sort of reputable skill sets, then I think it’s safe to say that the Geyserville and Lytton Springs wines have earned their fair share of accolades from all corners of the critical world, and they’ve done so as field-blends. In addition, I spend every weekend of my life sharing these wines with guests at our Monte Bello Tasting Room, and I know first-hand the pleasure these wines bring to their palates.

In the end, to each their own, of course, but we as a producer believe in field-blends, and I like to think our wines prove the concept; I love the Geyserville and Lytton Springs wines; I love them year after year after year, and I think their singular array of complexities and multi-tiered aromatics and flavors are due in no small part to the performance of those field-blended varietals.

The French Laundry Cometh …

July 26, 2010

Had such a fine time today! We very happily hosted the extraordinary wine team from the impossibly fine French Laundry today; wonderful, wonderful guests, and dare I say it, wonderful, wonderful wines. Such a treat to have them here, it was an absolute pleasure to host. And what a spread of wine! Couldn’t imagine more pleasant company to share these offerings with, and I hope our guests enjoyed the opportunity to be on the receiving end of the hospitality endeavor; lord knows they’re committed to providing it, I hope we were able to offer at least a modicum of payback. Special cheers to our VP of Vineyard Operations David Gates for his exceptional touring and hosting, and a heartfelt thank you to our guests; for their participation in The French Laundry’s timeless contribution to California’s culinary legacy, and of course for their support of our wines!

As to the wines themselves, here is the rundown of what we tasted:

2008 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay
2006 Monte Bello Chardonnay

2008 Lytton Springs (not yet released)
2008 PaganiRanch (not yet released)
2008 York Creek (not yet released)

2008 Geyserville
2008 East Bench
2008 Paso Robles
2008 Ponzo

1999 Geyserville
1999 Lytton Springs

2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Cabernet/Merlot (375ml)
2007 Monte Bello (not yet released/375ml)
2006 Monte Bello (375ml)

1988 Monte Bello
1990 Monte Bello
1995 Monte Bello (375ml)

For myself, quite a day. Thelong  journey from here …

… to there!

Wine Bloggers Tasting, Edition II, The Notes!

July 12, 2010

The Line-Up: About To Be Decanted And Tasted

Well, we’ve just completed the second edition of our Wine Bloggers Tasting, and with a belly full of Rhones and cheese (Triple-Cream Gouda, Blue Stilton, and Farmhouse Cheddar, atop Watsonville Sourdough), I’m now sitting down to pen some proper tasting notes. 

A Spread Of Carignane

But first, a hearty cheers and thank you to our attendees, all of whom proved to be winning companions, gracious guests, insightful tasters, and a lot of fun! I’ll be posting a summary of their write-ups as they come available, but I encourage you to visit all their sites whenever the mood strikes. You can find links here

Decanting The Carignanes

Our theme for this tasting was a selection of Rhone varietal wines that are released through our ATP program; meaning these are wines that are extremely limited-production, and available only through the winery, either via the member program, in the tasting rooms, or online. 

Through The Drinking Glass

I set the tasting up as a series of mini-verticals, with all but one vertical being two-vintages wide. The exception was the first series we tasted, a trio of Buchignani Ranch Carignane. We tasted the 2002, the 2005, and the 2008 vintages. 

The Bloggers

2002 Ridge Vineyards Buchignani Ranch Carignane 

Very rustic nose, loads of minerality, with a hint of mulchy herbality and some autumnal dried fruits. A simmering crimson in the glass, evidencing medium-to-light viscosity …tremendous acidity right out of the gate, with some semi-sour cherry, a trace of menthol, and some black herbs alongside … mid-palate sees the acidity spreading from tongue-tip to side-of-tongue, and allows for the emergence of some coffee ground notes mixed with fennel, chicory, and a hint of dried cranberries … not a particularly long finish, but acidity remains omnipresent … would love to have this at table with a high-fat-content dish that is thickly sauced but lightly spiced … 

Tasting Notes!

2005 Ridge Vineyards Buchignani Ranch Carignane 

Just a wealth of fruit on the nose by comparison; not to belittle the previous, but rather, to magnify the distinction … primarily laden with pluot notes, hints of tangelo and blood orange, with a drop of quince to boot … rounder, fleshier mouthfeel; a tad more viscous, but still positively singing with acidity … lighter in the core of the mid-palate mouthfeel, but ringed with vibrant spice and acidity around the perimeter, and introducing a rather exotic panoply of eastern, almost curry-esque spices … the mouthfeel is slightly longer and rounder than the 2002, but is still stepping out acidity first … and courtesy of the buoyant acidity, but in deference to the fleshier fruits, this wine for me begs for cheese pairing; at the moment, it’s going very well with Cypress Grove’s Humboldt Fog … 

Iron Chevsky and Dan Snyder

2008 Ridge Vineyards Buchignani Ranch Carignane 

A lil’ baby by comparison, the 2008 is just emerging from swaddle, and as such is only just beginning to show the deep purple-y fruit and caramel-y aromatics that traditionally seem to mark our young carignanes … the nose is a tad more berry-laden, with the fruit showing a bit more preserves-like concentration …  more flesh-ful at point-of-entry than either of the previous 2 vintages, accordingly rendering the still-notably-vibrant acidity to a comparably more subservient role; don’t get me wrong, there is acidity to spare here, but fleshier opulence of the fruit provides a more aggressive counterbalance … some tannins here as well, providing a pleasing scaffold for the fruit to hang on … as above, not a particularly long finish, but oodles of food-friendly acidity here as well, though if you’re looking for a sipper as opposed to an at-table offering, this is probably the best bet of the three … 

Dave Tong and Fely Krewell

Next up was a pair of Syrah/Grenache blends from our Lytton Springs vineyards; 2006 & 2005. These are both 50/50 blends, with the ’05 being already sold out, and the 2006 slated for a late fall release. In both cases, the Grenache was fully crushed, while the Syrah was fermented whole-berry, and also in both cases, the two varietals were fermented separately prior to assemblage. 

Roland Dumas, Thea Dwelle, & Jason Mancebo

2006 Ridge Vineyards Syrah/Grenache 

Loads of farm-fresh strawberry preserves on the nose, seeds and all, and not a tad cloying; just bright, buoyant, fresh, mid-to-high-tone red fruit, with a deep underlayer of anise and fennel and sweet clove … a very decadently mentholated cocoa-and-mint sensation at point-of-entry, spreading into a harvest-berry-galette mode mid-palate; meaning a sweet breadiness mingling with a richly complex baked-fruit compression … finish is long and vibrant, with structure to spare, bespeaking a long and harmonious future; no hurry on this one; tannins alone guarantee great longevity, particularly as the intensity of fruit is more than primed to keep pace … 

Liren Baker, Wes Barton, & Richard Jennings

2005 Ridge Vineyards Syrah/Grenache 

All the great fruit of the above on offer in spades, with just a hint of ever-so-slightly funky reductivity still lingering in the aromatics … a great tarry-dark layer providing the aromatic carpet upon which the mixed-berry furniture is arranged; mostly blueberry in character, with subtle hints of blackberry and black plum; key word being “black” … very structure-forward at point-of-entry, with an intense display of tannins early on, primarily in the tooth-to-lip realm … while the mid-palate is somewhat narrow, not yet spreading into the cheeks, the concentration is impressive … the finish feels a bit cut-short, with all the muscle on display early; this is a wine that, while more mature than the ’06 by date, seems younger in character, and seems to want a tad more bottle age to fully open up and display its full range; the structure is there, as is the undercurrent, we’re just waiting on the bright fruits to emerge … 

Jason of Jason's!

From the Syrah/Grenache we moved to a duo of Lytton West Syrahs, both comprised of fruit from a western parcel on the Lytton Springs property, and in both cases, featuring co-fermented viognier; 9% in the 2003, and 6% in the 2005. 

2003 Ridge Vineyards Lytton West Syrah 

Intensely, intensely sweet fruit on the nose; so concentrated, so compressed, so decadent, with a certain woodiness afoot as well … and more of the same on the palate; for those who like a complexly fruit-forward spread of sheer fleshly opulence, this really ought to appeal; that said, loads of late-emerging tannins to scaffold the fruit, and youthful acidity as well, but the real story here is just fruit, upon fruit, upon rich, sweet fruit; not over-ripe by any means, and not overtly viscous as regards mouthfeel; meaning, essentially, sweet in character, if not in actual RS … post-meal, in the big chair, by the fire, leather-bound book in hand, chocolate on the night stand, sheep dog asleep at your feet, yessir, yessir, yes … 

2005 Ridge Vineyards Lytton West Syrah 

Far more driven by a salmagundi of  herb-and-spice than the ’03, this still has loads of rich fruit on the nose, but is demonstrably less sweet in overall character … licorice, fennel, anise, and an autumnal chutney’s worth of dark minty herbs dominate, escorting in a subtle parade of blueberry and ollalie berry as the nose opens … succulent if not decadent at point-of-entry, leading to concentration if not compression; meaning the mid-palate is rich but not overt, intense but not abrupt, emotive but not ecstatic … a unique sort of blueberry lacquer coats the tongue with a rich, saucy fruit and seed profile, leading into a shorter, crisper, perhaps more focused finish than the ’03; two sides of the viticultural coin, these two; compote-sweet on the one side, mincemeat-spicy on the other … 

And lastly but most definitely not leastly, we concluded our tasting with two vintages of our Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah … 

2006 Ridge Vineyards Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah 

Given that this is a wine with decades, if not centuries, of ageability written into its very DNA, it’s not surprising that this very young, yet-to-be-released offering isn’t giving up much in the way of aromatics just yet; hints of dark, inky, black fruit goodness, but only hints … the point-of-entry is predictably tannin-heavy, though as the wine moves to mid-palate, its notable how much blueberry-esque fruit tones begin to emerge from the primordial LaBrea of young petite sirah structure … the finish is tannin, tannin, and more tannin; pleasing tannin, mind you, and cloaking a very sincere and earnest display of kinder/gentler petite sirah inkiness, but this is, at this point, a wine to watch, but not to drink … come winter, when this sees release, look for me, and a wedge of aromatic cheese, to be hiding in your basement, with a candle lit, reading Dickens … 

2003 Ridge Vineyards Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah 

Mitigated expression of aromatics here as well, though there are a few more balls being juggled; in addition to the near-ubiquitous blackness of fruit notes, and the inky compression of herbs, there is a hint of some pleasantly by-comparison higher-tone fruit coming through in the bouquet … the wine really comes alive at point-of-entry, with a surprisingly resolved mouthfeel lush with integrative complexities afoot … little in the way of acidity coming through mid-palate, but the elegance of the fruit is almost astonishingly delightful; if you know someone who thinks they don’t particularly care for petite sirah (some of the more common complaints being that petite sirah can occasionally, if mishandled or grown in inappropriate regions, be prone to being too heavy, too dark, too inky, too muscular, too mono-dimensional), this is, I think, a brilliant point-of-entry into the PS. I Love You world …

1999 Geyserville, New Tasting Notes!

June 17, 2010

One glance at the label sends me sailing headlong into the Sea of Smiles; 68% Zinfandel, 16% Carignane, 16% Petite Sirah. Wonderful.

With 43 vintages under the belt, there is a substantive amount of compare-and-contrast on offer as regards our Geyserville. As with any of our single-vineyard designations, there is, by design and of necessity, a certain amount of pendular aesthetic swing on a vintage-to-vintage basis; the wines wouldn’t be honest to their respective terroirs if there wasn’t: Mother Nature does not repeat herself, neither should a wine. (That said, Geyserville always tastes like Geyerville, making it always unlike any other wine. One man’s semi-humble opinion!)

Anyhow, the point being, different vintages have different personalities, and in terms of my personal aesthetic preferences, I tend to prefer the years where the supporting cast of mixed blacks has a larger role, so to see a full 16% of both Carignane and Petite Sirah in the blend just flat out makes me happy.

So, on to the wine itself:

 

Lovely aromatics: a great spread of North American  autumnal spice & a more exotic international spice spectrum; notes of cardamom in particular. All this juxtaposed against rich, ripe fruits and a succulent hint of honeysuckle … perfectly round mouthfeel at point-of-entry, with an unexpectedly dark underlayer supporting an architecture of utterly vivacious acidity and winsome yet strangely present tannins … mid-palate shows a mitigated robustness that expresses more refinement than muscularity, and is permeated through and through with multi-tiered complexities redolent of spice-box herbality and coarse-ground pepper; both white and black …  the finish is almost polite, asking little of the palate other than genuine appreciation for time spent in fine, witty, and urbane company; in short, elegance, refinement, class, integrity, and complexity. Geyserville, perfect company for a perfect evening.

2006 Lyttton Estate Zinfandel: Tasting Notes …

April 26, 2010

The 2006 Lytton Estate Zinfandel, a very limited-production estate zin comprised of fruit from several very select parcels within the boundaries of the Lytton Springs vineyards, was released to ATP members-only earlier this month, but it’s about to come into our tasting rooms, so I thought I’d share some current tasting notes; and by current I mean right now!

Beautiful black plum-toned belly rimmed by a bright magenta halo and offering legs that bespeak a substantive viscosity … Deep and concentrated aromatics, evidencing the full extent to which the 16% Petite Sirah influences the composition of this wine; brazen berry notes are underlaid with a darker, tarrier layer, giving much heft to the bouquet; fairly strong wood notes as well, but not particularly oaky per se, more of a sandalwood and light cedar character … thickly weighted point-of-entry, spreading bright acidity to the cheeks, clumpy-plummy fruit to the back of the tongue, and layering intense tannins across the teeth and the inside of the lips … great side-tongue acidity as well; very structure-forward at this point, and wildly mouth-filling, with a nice layer of granular minerality … A little smokiness emerges towards the back-palate, and continues into the long and sizzling finish … A heavy-duty excitement wine that trades away more common traits of California zin related to ripeness, voluptuousness, and fleshiness, in favor of muscularity, depth, and concentration. Quite young, certainly drinkable now, but with a multi-year future in the cellar should you wish it.

I should note that I am tasting this wine while enjoying my lunch, a rather hearty and cheese-heavy spin on spinach lasagna, and the two complement one another awfully well!

A Whole Lotta Ridgin’ Goin’ On! -or- All The Wine That’s Fit To Print!

February 5, 2010

Great slew of Ridge information out there lately, in terms of contemporary tasting notes and other such items of interest to the Ridge-O-Philes among ye; some of it is Post-Zap commentary, some of it is Post-Ridge Events commentary, and some of it is just plain self-generated commentary, but it’s all good, all interesting, and all most appreciated! Here’s a lil’ round-up of some quite interesting articles out there:

For an excellently thorough look at a very fine line up of Ridge zinfandels from a very fine wine blog, look no further than “The Great Ridge Zinfandel Line-Up: Or, Yet Another Reason Why California is the Best State” over on Vinicultured: A Wine Blog. Here is what was tasted and notated:

  • 2005 Ridge “Paso Robles” Zinfandel | 100% Zinfandel | Paso Robles
  • 2006 Ridge “East Bench” Zinfandel | 100% Zinfandel | Dry Creek Valley
  • 2006 Ridge “Ponzo” Zinfandel | 95% Zinfandel, 5% Petite Sirah | Russian River Valley
  • 2005 Ridge “Pagani Ranch” Zinfandel | 96% Zinfandel, 2% Petite Sirah, 1% Alicante Bouschet, 1% Mataro | Sonoma Valley
  • 2006 Ridge “Geyserville” Zinfandel | 70% Zinfandel, 18% Carignane, 10% Petite Sirah, 2% Mataro | Alexander Valley
  • 2007 Ridge “Geyserville” Zinfandel | 58% Zinfandel, 22% Carignane, 18% Petite Sirah, 2% Mataro | Alexander Valley
  • 2007 Ridge “Lytton Springs” Zinfandel | 71% Zinfandel, 22% Petite Sirah, 7% Carignane | Dry Creek Valley
  •  

    For those of you who might prefer the more technical side of oeno-literature, there is an absolutely  fascinating article currently available over on “Wines & Vines” by Tim Patterson entitled “With Fermenters, Does Size Matter?”  Tim is a wine writer and home wine-maker, or garagiste, shall we say, and this is a fascinating look at the matter of fermentor sizes, and the effect this has on resulting wines. Our very own Paul Draper makes an excellent appearance in the article, and while I encourage you to dive in and read the whole thing, I’ve included Paul’s portion of the content below:

    Paul Draper at Ridge Vineyards says that Ridge tries to fit the fermenter to the size of the parcel being harvested — a portion of a particular vineyard that comes ripe at the same time. The Ridge facilities have several sizes available — all of them small by Lockwood standards, not because of some philosophy of tanks, but rather a philosophy geared toward careful parcel picking.

    The Ridge Monte Bello Cabernet ripens in patches of maybe 1- to 5-tons, and the same is true for some portions of the Zinfandel harvest from Lytton Springs and Geyserville. The Dusi Ranch vineyard in Paso Robles, on the other hand, is more rolling than ridge-y, so its lots of Zinfandel tend to be routed to larger fermenters.

    The array of relatively small fermenters offers more chance for control and probably better extraction, Draper believes. He adds an interesting historical observation: The current fondness for small fermenters is partly a reaction to the early days of California winemaking, when huge vessels produced uneven fermentations and poor extraction.

    And I’d of course be remiss if I didn’t mention to you that, as it turns out, Ridge was not just Day 23 over on Jerry Bullfrog’s Wine Stash, we were days 23-29! Meaning there is a lot of excellent reading on our wines to be found on this site; in case you didn’t catch my initial discovery of this blog, you can find out about it here; in short, it’s a great premise for a blog, and something very well worth reading, both for the Ridge commentary, and, well, everything else! But if you want to sample some idiosyncratically intensive and endearingly left-of-center contemporary tasting notes on the following wines: the 2007 Late Harvest Dusi Ranch Zinfandel, the 2005 Lytton West Syrah, the 2003 Geyserville, the 2006 Buchignani Ranch Carignane, the 2007 East Bench, the 2004 Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah, the 1992 Santa Cruz Mountains Chardonnay, and the 2006 Monte Bello, then you need to read the Bullfrog!

    Thanks for reading, and check back shortly for a follow-up round-up of Post-Zap commentary!


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 81 other followers