Archive for February, 2010

Tasting Notes: 80s Era Geyserville & Lytton Springs!

February 26, 2010

I recently had the opportunity to enjoy an extraordinary quintet of 80s era Geyserville and Lytton Springs, and was particularly pleased to be tasting with my lovely missus, who contributed mightily to the quality and intensity of the experience. I’ll confess that I was rather swooned about the whole thing, and accordingly, if my notes below occasionally veer to the seemingly hyperbolic, I beg you to trust me, I was feeling it! It really was a wonderful tasting …

The Anatomy Of A Tasting

 

1981 Geyserville

Rich, earthy nose, with forest floor and pine notes; beautifully old-world tiers of aroma, yet unexpectedly exotic: bamboo shoot, mushroom, and cedar right out of the gate, underlaid with brine, japanese radish and burdock, as well as pipe tobacco. Pull your nose back from the glass, and there is even a halo of aromatic menthol on offer. Tremendously fresh acidity, and a plush mouthfeel at point of entry that rolls back, then flattens out, then returns to tip-of-tongue with bright citricity. The mid-palate expresses concentratedly exotic richness, conjuring mixed-tone olive tapenade and chutney. A trace of charred wood nearing the finish, joined by back-of-tongue tannin comingling with acidity, makes for a finish that begs for higher fat content dishes that can match this wine spice for spice; meaning, not so much butter or oil-derived fats, but more meaty and succulent offerings. At nearly 30 years of age, secondary and tertiary maturation character is leading the way, as opposed to any dominant and lingering fruit sweetness, thus while this may not be a gentle sipper, it’s a wild and winsome offering for a richly laid table.

1988 Geyserville

Stunningly omnipresent call-up of berry pie on the nose; carmelized sugar, vanilla, warm wheat, baked berries (mixed harvest: boysenberry, blackberry, blueberry) and an ever-so-slight juxtaposition of sweet and herbaceous conjuring strawberry-rhubarb …  Interwoven amongst the fresh sunny fruits is a singularly muscular set of tones that evoke a blend of chili beans, hearty broth, and stewed root vegetables and tomatoes marinated in balsamic … or is it cumin and pepper? (Or is that just what I want to eat with this wine?) Pure velvet mouthfeel spreading all over the tongue, from point-of-entry to mid-palate, introducing a fine spread of autumnal nutmeg and winter clove that’s been mitigated by hot whiskey and a squeeze of fireside lemon (wood and citrus) … The lushness carries through to the close, and the youthful vibrancy lights up the finish with a final display of baked fruits, though at the end it’s more apple than berry … remarkably, the tannins and acidity are both present and accounted for, and very much in balance. At 20+ years, this is a fresh as one could hope for, and more …

1989 Geyserville

Hints of the afore-referenced fruit pie on the nose, though the character is higher-tone red, and more fruit-centric with less reliance on the tangential ingredient list …  the fruit here instead is counterbalanced by beautifully environmental components; most notably wet river stone, cherry blossom, and sweet meadow grass. Sweet earth here as well, but delicate, not cloying. A quick rush of Umami savoriness at point-of-entry, swelling into an even meatier mid-palate. The back-end, however, narrows again, as a river moving through a varying landscape; meaning the wine is narrow early on, but widens to wild rapids fairly quickly, expands to complacent width mid-palate, then funnels through the narrows at the close. Throughout, the forest presence remains constant, though it’s forest floor, and the attendant concentration, as opposed to a brighter herbaceousness, that limns the palate movement. The wine beguiles for the most part, though the kiss is more enticing than the prospect of a long relationship. Translated, it’s a brilliant sipping wine, a brilliant first-wine-of-the-night, but the skittishness of the finish means it’s less suited to the full committment of the table.

1987 Lytton Springs

The color of this wine! So deep, so dark, quite remarkable …  Powerful pairing of woodiness and florality on the nose; succulently perfumed flower notes (violet and lavender) dancing on a floor of redwood and mahogany, partnering with faint strains of anise, menthol, and vanilla. Congruent to this is a strong herb character, led primarily by bay leaf … Lots of cherry and menthol point-of-entry, with a continuation of the bouquet into the palate experience; wood, flower, herbs … strong residual tannin presence, mostly front-palate, calling up black olive and tea leaf … the mouthfeel presence is more width than length, meaning the action is in the cheeks more so than the chest … a touch of fruit up front, then a strong and dark herb conclusion, with hints of pine and forest floor. Shorter all around, but worth it for the intensity of the approach, and the richness of the resin.

1989 Lytton Springs

Deeply menthol and eucalyptal-laden nose, with saturated cherry notes to boot, but not at all cloying, and even despite the sweet hint of vanilla, the nose is indisputably inviting, as opposed to  saccharine; note the subtle strains of quiet campfire ember, and the evokement of a sun-warmed redwood deck, and the enticement becomes nearly impossibly fresh. Warmth is the overarching component to the front-palate, followed closely by a subtle and healthy decadence of concentrated fruit… Chewy through the first two-thirds, with sweet grain and dried fruit character leading the way, followed by fresh acidity and fresh fruit vibrancy next in line … What’s perhaps most singular is the brightness of the tropicality, most notably notes of banana and papaya, looming up in the finish. Given the briskness of the acidity at the close, this is a remarkably fresh and vibrant 20-year wine.

Tasting Notes: 15-Vintage Monte Bello Vertical! (Milestone and Milestones!)

February 19, 2010

Well, this is a bit of a milestone post for what is still quite a young blog; it’s the 200th post! Accordingly, I want to do something a little special to mark the occasion, and this is what I have to offer:

I very recently had the astonishingly great pleasure of sitting at table with Paul Draper, Eric Baugher, David Gates, David Amadia, Nicole Buttitta, Karen Schmidt, and Shun Ishikubo of Ridge, and Guillaume Bienaime and John Sanders of the very fine restaurant Marché in Menlo Park, to taste through 15 vintages of Monte Bello! Needless to say, it was one of the more extraordinary tasting experiences of my life. My only regret is that we didn’t have all day to sip and savor! But this was work …

So, given the rigor and intensity of the tasting, combined with the unavoidable time constraint of a morning tasting on a workday, we had to move pretty seriously and rapidly through the offerings, and accordingly my notes are somewhat brief and a bit riffy, but I hope they give you at least a reasonably in-focus picture of what an utterly astonishing palate experience this was … sprinkled throughout are some observations from Eric Baugher as well, who very kindly gave me a copy of his notes as a resource.

We tasted the wines in groups, the first of which was a foursome comprised of the 2000, the 2002, the 2004, and the 2005 Monte Bellos. First though, for a proverbial wetting of the whistle, we sampled the 1999 Monte Bello Chardonnay. Mon Dieu! What a delicious wine!

1999 Monte Bello Chardonnay

Warm and nutty on the nose, with hints of caramel, butterscotch and vanilla, and a rich and complex tropicality. Mouthfilling and pleasantly viscous without being at all cloying. Mid-palate weight is intensified by strong minerality and a hint of bread-y yeastiness. The finish is long and woody, yet shows lots of bright acidity. Starting to develop secondary and tertiary maturation characteristics, but still delightfully youthful …

Ok, back to our inaugural foursome: 00, 02, 04, and 05 …

2000 Monte Bello

Elegant and playful, yet deeply concentrated, exhibiting bright notes of pomegranate and cranberry layered over a compellingly dark sub-strata redolent of cocoa, leather, fennel, and cigar-box; notable for the juxtaposition of weight and beauty, deep coloration and vibrant concentration …

2002 Monte Bello

Muscular, viscous, and tannin-forward, with rich notes of tar and earth coating a core of crisp bright red fruits and spicy dried fruits; cherry on the red side, black currant on the dried side … definitely youthful and fragrant, but notable for depth of both strength and length …

2004 Monte Bello

Minty and eucalyptal, with strong hints of cherry and menthol; very vibrant and herbaceous, with deep layers of cassis, leather, and tobacco … very elegant and complex, resolving nicely, and showing classic Monte Bello minerality …

2005 Monte Bello

Big, fruit-forward, and intensely structured, with a vast and complex array of fruit profiles brimming away in the bouquet and infusing the body … loads of mountain fruit character, led by a rich blueberry layer and followed by a delightful violet-laden florality … hints of cassis and blackberry, with a saturated peppering of clove and cardamom over nicely chalky tannins …

Not a bad way to lead off a flight, not by any stretch of the imagination! From there, we proceeded to our next foursome, this time a close look at some key vintages from the nineties: 1991, 1992, 1995, and 1997.

 

1991 Monte Bello

I’ve waxed rhapsodic about this vintage many times before, sometimes to almost embarrassing effect (dig this post!), and this tasting did nothing to dissuade me from the very firm conviction that my affections are most decidedly not misplaced. It’s just wonderful, a fully completed circle, every component perfectly placed, a ballet of integration, reconciliation, and harmony; ripe but tempered, complex yet approachable, dark but fruitful, buoyant yet earthy. A treat to taste …

1992 Monte Bello

Astonishingly complex aromatics, very expressive, with a rich perfume. Elegant but well-structured, with very juicy, concentrated fruit. Nicely compressed juxtapositions of licorice and violet, and cigar and pine. Very present acidity and lively fruits transition from a dense middle through to a long and enticing finish …

1995 Monte Bello

Very firmly structured, and defiantly structure-forward. A nice touch of earthiness, and big fruits paving the way for controlled and subtle acidity. Nice blend of forest floor and wet stone co-mingling with hints of cola and black licorice, making for an overall powerful and complex offering …

1997 Monte Bello

Showing remarkably youthful still, and still opening up accordingly. Fully structure-forward, and still flexing its impending complexities … Starting to develop deep mountain fruit characteristics amongst the already present Monte Bello minerality, and clearly heading for a deep and seductive mid-palate around a nicely earthy core …

This foursome was followed by what I think we all collectively agreed was the surprise grouping of the bunch, a five-wine vertical of 80′s era Monte Bello: 1981, 1984, 1985, 1988, ands 1989. I say surprise because this decade as a whole has suffered some disparagement in the past, but to our collective palates, this was easily the most difficult group to pull favorites from; they all showed magnificently!

 

1981 Monte Bello

Deep, deep notes of fudge, chocolate, and cocoa, below an nearly-as-dark-layer of tar and chipotle, sewed together with a decadent chord of umami notes. Loads of black fruits, firm tannins, and still-lively acidity, and showing secondary and tertiary characteristics redolent of balsamic and molasses …

1984 Monte Bello

A very pleasant mintiness on the nose, with lots of red fruits and a hint of menthol and eucalyptus. A near feral intensity to the fruit layers, dominated by an almost sweet cherry character. Intense, pungent, and powerful, with great structure and length …

1985 Monte Bello

Woodsy, and very complexly so, with hints of caramel, vanilla, and cream blending with a slight citricity to almost evoke a caramel apple, wooden stick and all … Tremendously bright and youthful acidity, very fresh and young, with a subdued yet complex bouquet followed by a creamy blue-fruit laden middle and an herb-and-spice laden finish …

1988 Monte Bello

Archetypal “old-world” aromatics showing a concentrated mosaic of black cherry, cola, cedar, leather, and earth, with a concentrated mid-palate blending wild mountain fruit and exotic spice; perfectly resolved and structured, with still-youthful acidity and tannin …

1989 Monte Bello

Lots of fascinating structural components on offer, including dried currant, olive, and tobacco on the nose, and cedar, clove, and anise at entry. Complex without being weighty, with multiple layers of mineral, spice, and sweeter fruits mid-palate, closing with a firm and structure-forward finish …

The final grouping was a two-wine group, and this was really the treat of the bunch, both for the rarity, and the caliber! We first tasted the 1978 Monte Bello, and then the 1968! Unbelievable …

 

1978 Monte Bello

Decadent hints of stew, blood, and iodine simmering in the aromatics, meaning meaty, but not in an umami way, more Wellington-esque … Wonderful second and third tier characteristics on display, including clove, sandalwood, tobacco, and cedar, modulating sweet and concentrated fruits into an earthy and complex body, finishing very lively and vigorous …

1968 Monte Bello

Just astonishing, a 42-year-old wine, and yet still showing so much power, complexity, and concentration. Lots of classic mountain minerality, dried fruits, and sweet sauce notes (plum and balsamic), with a structurally enticing duskiness foreshadowing a rustic mid-palate, and closing with a completed-circle reappearance of marrow-like notes couched in a wrap of sandalwood and cigar …

And that was it for the tasting. I don’t think I’ll ever forget it. And while I recognize that the purchase of an older-vintage Monte Bello is not an every day investment, I heartily encourage you all to find a way to sample some of the these older vintages, whether through purchases, or via one of the special tastings that we host in our tasting rooms., It’s an experience that will not leave you for a long, long time …

And thank you to the powers that be for letting me be a part of such an extraordinary tasting!

Wine Quote Of The Week!

February 16, 2010

I’ve certainly written about Haiku before, and certainly about wine as awareness ritual, and the following is for me a wonderful opportunity to enjoy the cojoinment of both in a single set of 17 glorious syllables. Unfortunately the source remains unknown to us today, so we’ve no one to thank for this elegant pearl of insight, but this does not dampen in the slightest my appreciation for the sentiment. The Japanese is as follows:

Sake nakuta
Nan no onore ga
Sakura kana

Which can be translated as:

Without flowing wine
What good to me are lovely
Cherry trees in bloom?

Let the wine flow, friends, let the wine flow …

The Weird & Wonderful World Of Search Engine Terms!

February 10, 2010

Hmmmm … well, as most of you probably know, the various services out there that provide hosting for blogs usually offer some statistical information as part of the package; how many visits you’ve received, what posts were read, which links were clicked, etc. One of the features that WordPress (our host!) offers is a list of Search Engine Terms; these are the words and phrases people have entered into various search engines that led them to our blog, and boy, is this a weird and wonderful list! In no particular order, here is a short list of some of those terms:

zoot muppet

baked beans wine match

history of women dressed as men

caprese

chinese ancient poem beautiful

plymouth reliant

abstract wine and jazz art

georgia o’keeffe cow head

chinese wine dipper

open fire panini grill tongue

“difficult job”

bee gees

fancy wine quotes

7-eleven winery

black musicians born in february

poems about seducing someone to have sex

wine aroma wheel questions

drink wine poem unfaithful

thank you for attending

And perhaps the weirdest and wonderfullest of all:

porno griller

Wine Quote Of The Week!

February 9, 2010

For this week’s quote, we turn to an ageless wisdom culled from a vast repository of anonymous Latin Proverbs carried down through the ages to our present times. And lest ye doubt the sageness of said wells of wit, do recall the following icons of insight as having had similar origin:

“Art has no enemy except ignorance”

“By learning you will teach, by teaching you will learn.”

“All the hours wound you, the last one kills.”

“Every madman thinks all other men mad.”

And of course the very well-known “In Vino Veritas,” which is rather on-point for our purposes here. But it’s not our quote of the week, rather, I submit the following:

It is well to remember that there are five reasons for drinking: the arrival of a friend, one’s present or future thirst, the excellence of the wine, or any other reason.

Cheers!

The Event Of The Century?

February 8, 2010

Ok, maybe not the event of the century, but certainly an EXTREMELY noteworthy one! What is it? It’s this:

The Monte Bello Half-Bottle Showcase!

And what exactly does that mean? It’s means this:

Please join Ridge Vineyards as we taste an extraordinary vertical flight of library Monte Bello bottled in 375 ml format! Not only are half-bottles an economical way to take home a bottle of our flagship Monte Bello Cabernet blend, but courtesy of the accelerated development of wines bottled in smaller format, these very cellarable vintages are ready to drink now! So, as these bottlings are only available in extremely limited quantities, this event accordingly constitutes a very unique opportunity to taste and purchase rare Monte Bello offerings; the 1987, 1988, and 1993 vintages will be priced at $85, $100, and $100 respectively (special event-only pricing!), or, you can purchase the trio for $250.00!

And when is this happening? It’s happening on Valentine’s Day Weekend! February 13th & 14th, 11-4pm, we’ll be offering a very special Monte Bello Tasting Flight comprised of our 2006 Monte Bello Chardonnay, our 2006 Monte Bello (current vintage!), and the three-vintage half-bottle Monte Bello vertical! This flight will be available for $30/person for non-members, and $15/person for members. (And hey members, don’t forget that February is a Membership Month, which means you can extend your member pricing on the Monte Bello Tasting Flight to as many guests as you wish to bring with you!)

The Trio

In the esteemed company of Paul Draper and Eric Baugher, I had the great privilege of tasting through a wide array of older-vintage Monte Bellos in half-bottle as we prepared for this event, and what follows is a brief compendium of our tasting notes on the three vintages we selected for this weekend:

Tasting Notes
Monte Bello Vertical: 1987, 1988, 1993
(375 ml)
Tasters: Paul Draper, Eric Baugher, Christopher Watkins

1987 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello, 375 ml
$85/btl.
(Event-Only Pricing!)

Notes of sweet fruits & candied fruits resulting in a singularly nectar’d florality, co-mingling with aromatics redolent of sandalwood, charcoal, underbrush and chapparal — Palate notes of olive, tobacco, orange peel, raisin, and cedar —An enticing juxtaposition of sweet and sour, with a very earthy, very rustic character — Structurally, very vibrant acidity and notably chalky tannins make for a Monte Bello that is developed, resolved, and ready to drink. 

1988 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello, 375 ml
$100/btl.
(Event-Only Pricing!)

Opulent and complex on the nose, with a fine mix of crushed rock minerality, black currant, baked pie cherries and mixed berry jam (Marion and Logan), leading to a sweet center exhibiting bright red fruits, faint strains of pomegranate & leather, and a superb intensity — Mouthfeel-wise, very dense, very full — Structurally, lively acidity, and firm tannins decidedly present but resolved — All in all, a fine mixture of layered mountain fruits, buoyant acidity, muscular tannins, and an elegant resolution. An ideal drinker.

1993 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello, 375 ml
$100/btl.
(Event-Only Pricing!)

Exotic nose blending mint & red current with Umami notes of soy and teriyaki, plus an additional layer of eucalyptus and bay leaf counterbalancing caramel apples, spiced chocolate, and vanilla — Rich mid-palate fruits mixing with secondary wet stone and tertiary mixed olives to form a complex center — Appealing, integrated, and just a bit different — Very well structured, and ready to drink. 

The Pour

We did a little sneak preview of this vertical at our First Friday event on the evening of the 5th, and a very well-regarded wine blogger who was in attendance has posted his tasting notes on-line, should you wish to read some additional perspective. Here is what he wrote:

’87 Monte Bello (SCM)
(Includes 5% Merlot, 3% Cabernet Franc. 11.7% alc.)
Nose – warm spicy cigar box and rich dark fruit, lovely peppery tobacco.
Lighter body with intense tobacco and black currant, smoky, good minerality, dusty tannin, blackberry. 92 pts

’88 Monte Bello (SCM)
(Includes 3% Merlot, 2% Petit Verdot. 12.9% alc.)
Nose – smooth full purple fruit, kind of rustic, creamy, cardamom, smoke, dried herbs.
Sweetish tart boysenberry, smoke, blackberry, blue elderberry, plum, black currant, dusty/woody tannin. Comes together a bit odd in a way – tart, round youthful fruit, light body – that more time may help. 88+ pts

’93 Monte Bello (SCM)
(Includes 7% Merlot, 7% Petit Verdot. 12.5% alc.)
Nose – minty lamb, smooth, intense, shy and youthful blackberry and black currant, eucalyptus, pineapple sage.
Lanolin, blackberry and black currant, smoky and tart, dusty and slightly grippy tannin, blue elderberry, dried sage. Very youthful. Funky jujube note and a touch of cedar. Should peak in about 15 years. 92 pts

The Swirl

So, in conclusion, I humbly submit that there is simply no better way to celebrate Valentine’s Day Weekend than to attend this remarkable tasting. Whether you’re in love and with your lover wishing to relish the delight and decadence of ready-to-drink Monte Bello, or whether you’re single and celebrating that you don’t have to share, this is not an event to be missed! And do note that this very special tasting flight will be on offer at both our Lytton Springs and Monte Bello Tasting Rooms.

The Line Up

February 13th & 14th, 2010: Monte Bello Half-Bottle Showcase!

February 13 & 14, 11-4pm
Monte Bello Tasting Room (Cupertino) & Lytton Springs Tasting Room (Healdsburg)

$15 for all Ridge Members, and $30 for the public.

The Wine

Hope to see you this weekend!

For more information about upcoming events at Ridge Vineyards, please click here.

Bottling Line Video!

February 8, 2010

Care to see the Ridge Vineyards bottlling line in action? Then jet on over to our Facebook page, and watch the 2008 East Bench going into bottle! Need a quicker way to get there? Just click here!

Ridge A to Z: The Follow-Up!

February 5, 2010

For those of you who may have missed it, we had a rather lovely event up here at Monte Bello not so very long back (you can read about it and see pics here), and the wine blog-o has very kindly offered up a pair of fine write-ups about said event, which I encourage you to take a look at, in the hopes of exciting you to the point of attendance next time around!

The first comes to us from our friend Dave Tong at his blog Santa Cruz Mountains and Santa Clara Valley wines, and it truly constitutes a really, really excellent summation of all we were trying to do with our Ridge A to Z Membership Showcase. Thanks Dave, we’re really happy you could attend! Here’s Dave’s write-up: Ridge Wine Clubs. Of particular note is Dave’s review of our 1992 Santa Cruz Mountains Chardonnay; this is not a wine I get to pour with anything resembling regularity, and it was a real treat to share it on this fine day. Here is what Dave had to say in his tasting notes:

1992 Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains
An interesting demonstration of how well Ridge wines age. Bear in mind that this is the second wine, the lots that didn’t make it into the Monte Bello Chardonnay, and isn’t intended to be aged. The colour was a nice bright yellow; I’d have expected a darker colour from an 18 year old wine. On the nose it was pure caramel; there was caramel and nuts on the palate. Showing a little oxidation and a light ‘fino sherry’ finish. A very interesting wine. I rarely get the chance to try whites this old and they typically disappoint, but this did not. 90

The second post I’d like to note is from our friends over at Barton Orchard, who also offered up a nice set of tasting notes from the event. You can find the post here, and as with Dave, Wes posted some great notes on the ’92 Chard as well …

92 Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains
Nose – very mature, smooth, hazelnut, cardamon, subtle lemon curd, tarragon. Hazelnut, savory lemon, smooth zest, cardamon and nutmeg, tarragon. Excellent mature Chard. Drink now. 92 pts

Cheers!

The Post-Zap Wrap! -or- The Post-Zap Rap!

February 5, 2010

Well, another ZAP has come and gone (just in case the acronym is not instantly recognizable, you can read a previous explanatory post here), and I have to tell you, in conversation with Paul Draper on Monday, he was absolutely over the moon about this year’s event, saying he thought it was just about one of the best ever, and not only was I of course very happy to hear that, but I am also hopeful that if you attended, your experience was equally positive!

Judging by the post-Zap write-ups out there, it looks as if Paul wasn’t the only one to have found this year’s Zinapalooza to be a rather notably excellent occurence, so, for those of you who were there and wish to relive the magic, and/or those of you who weren’t but want a retroactive taste, here’s a quick sampling of some of the great write-ups that followed this year’s Zinfandel Festival:

It’s probably not suprising that one of the most thorough posts comes to us from Alder Yarrow over at Vinography, whose article is entitled ”The Best Zinfandels in California: Tasting at ZAP 2010.” A heady title to say the least, and of course one man’s opinion is but one man’s opinion, but his is an opinion I always consider it a privilege to be privy to, and so I’m doubly pleased to find that our wines found a more-than-respectable place on his tasting roster. Interestingly enough perhaps, and certainly a good sign for the future, is that our as-of-yet unreleased 2008 Pagani Ranch was the top-scoring Ridge wine! To see Alder’s full run-down, click here.

John Cesano has contributed an equally thorough post-Zap wrap-up on his blog, made all the more interesting for the fact that he sat in on our very own Eric Baugher’s zinfandel talk:

Friday, January 28, at 10:30 in the morning, 150 or so gathered in the Peacock Court Ballroom at the Intercontinental Mark Hopkins Hotel on Nob Hill in San Francisco for the 9th Annual Flights!: A Showcase of Zinfandels  seated wine tasting.

Five winemakers of Zinfandel would talk about Zinfandel blends, field blends and in-winery blends, the history and future of Zinfandel blends, and the place of Zinfandel blends in the market.

You can read the full spread of his thoughts and observations here.

And of course, you can return to The Gray Market Report (see previous reference here) for some excellent follow-up on ZAP wines, including a very nice nod to our 2007 Paso Robles. The full post is here. And just for kicks, you can see a reasonably and expectedly singular photo of W. Blake Gray and Alder Yarrow (well, their zinfandel-coated tongues, really) right here.

 I’ll conclude with a couple of photos taken by our very own Sean Yamamoto, just in case you’ve never for yourself experienced the inspired lunacy that can be ZAP; I like to think of these two pics as expressing the Before And After The Flood aspects of this wonderfully decadent event. Cheeers!

Before The Flood!

After The Flood!

A Whole Lotta Ridgin’ Goin’ On! -or- All The Wine That’s Fit To Print!

February 5, 2010

Great slew of Ridge information out there lately, in terms of contemporary tasting notes and other such items of interest to the Ridge-O-Philes among ye; some of it is Post-Zap commentary, some of it is Post-Ridge Events commentary, and some of it is just plain self-generated commentary, but it’s all good, all interesting, and all most appreciated! Here’s a lil’ round-up of some quite interesting articles out there:

For an excellently thorough look at a very fine line up of Ridge zinfandels from a very fine wine blog, look no further than “The Great Ridge Zinfandel Line-Up: Or, Yet Another Reason Why California is the Best State” over on Vinicultured: A Wine Blog. Here is what was tasted and notated:

  • 2005 Ridge “Paso Robles” Zinfandel | 100% Zinfandel | Paso Robles
  • 2006 Ridge “East Bench” Zinfandel | 100% Zinfandel | Dry Creek Valley
  • 2006 Ridge “Ponzo” Zinfandel | 95% Zinfandel, 5% Petite Sirah | Russian River Valley
  • 2005 Ridge “Pagani Ranch” Zinfandel | 96% Zinfandel, 2% Petite Sirah, 1% Alicante Bouschet, 1% Mataro | Sonoma Valley
  • 2006 Ridge “Geyserville” Zinfandel | 70% Zinfandel, 18% Carignane, 10% Petite Sirah, 2% Mataro | Alexander Valley
  • 2007 Ridge “Geyserville” Zinfandel | 58% Zinfandel, 22% Carignane, 18% Petite Sirah, 2% Mataro | Alexander Valley
  • 2007 Ridge “Lytton Springs” Zinfandel | 71% Zinfandel, 22% Petite Sirah, 7% Carignane | Dry Creek Valley
  •  

    For those of you who might prefer the more technical side of oeno-literature, there is an absolutely  fascinating article currently available over on “Wines & Vines” by Tim Patterson entitled “With Fermenters, Does Size Matter?”  Tim is a wine writer and home wine-maker, or garagiste, shall we say, and this is a fascinating look at the matter of fermentor sizes, and the effect this has on resulting wines. Our very own Paul Draper makes an excellent appearance in the article, and while I encourage you to dive in and read the whole thing, I’ve included Paul’s portion of the content below:

    Paul Draper at Ridge Vineyards says that Ridge tries to fit the fermenter to the size of the parcel being harvested — a portion of a particular vineyard that comes ripe at the same time. The Ridge facilities have several sizes available — all of them small by Lockwood standards, not because of some philosophy of tanks, but rather a philosophy geared toward careful parcel picking.

    The Ridge Monte Bello Cabernet ripens in patches of maybe 1- to 5-tons, and the same is true for some portions of the Zinfandel harvest from Lytton Springs and Geyserville. The Dusi Ranch vineyard in Paso Robles, on the other hand, is more rolling than ridge-y, so its lots of Zinfandel tend to be routed to larger fermenters.

    The array of relatively small fermenters offers more chance for control and probably better extraction, Draper believes. He adds an interesting historical observation: The current fondness for small fermenters is partly a reaction to the early days of California winemaking, when huge vessels produced uneven fermentations and poor extraction.

    And I’d of course be remiss if I didn’t mention to you that, as it turns out, Ridge was not just Day 23 over on Jerry Bullfrog’s Wine Stash, we were days 23-29! Meaning there is a lot of excellent reading on our wines to be found on this site; in case you didn’t catch my initial discovery of this blog, you can find out about it here; in short, it’s a great premise for a blog, and something very well worth reading, both for the Ridge commentary, and, well, everything else! But if you want to sample some idiosyncratically intensive and endearingly left-of-center contemporary tasting notes on the following wines: the 2007 Late Harvest Dusi Ranch Zinfandel, the 2005 Lytton West Syrah, the 2003 Geyserville, the 2006 Buchignani Ranch Carignane, the 2007 East Bench, the 2004 Dynamite Hill Petite Sirah, the 1992 Santa Cruz Mountains Chardonnay, and the 2006 Monte Bello, then you need to read the Bullfrog!

    Thanks for reading, and check back shortly for a follow-up round-up of Post-Zap commentary!


    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 66 other followers