Archive for June, 2009

Horizontal Multi-Designation Zinfandel Tasting With Friends Of The Winemakers

June 30, 2009

This past weeskend, I had the great pleasure of hosting a very interesting group, and presenting them with a very interesting tasting flight. The group in question was Friends of the Winemakers. Per their website, they are “a non-profit corporation whose purpose is to preserve the history of winemaking and the enjoyment of wine in the Santa Clara Valley and the Santa Cruz Mountains; to share the knowledge with others; and to stimulate interests about vineyards, varieties of wine, and the process of wine production.” The flight in question was a horizontal multi-designation zinfandel tasting. By “horizontal” I mean that all 6 wines were of the same vintage; in this case, 2006. And by “multi-designation” I mean that each zinfandel we tasted was comprised of fruit from one vineyard only, and each wine was from a different vineyard designation.

RIDGE Vineyards practices what we refer to as single-site winemaking. Save for one exception, all the wines in our portfolio are comprised, as noted above, of grapes grown on one single vineyard; accordingly, most of our wines are named for the vineyard property, as opposed to, say, the varietal. Given that we deploy a notably non-interventionist methodology in the vineyard (hand-harvesting, head-training, dry-farming, etc.), each vineyard that we work with has very different characteristics on offer as far as micro-climate, topography, soil type, vine history, etc. Meaning that the differences in taste between each wine ideally have to do with differences in the vineyards. Put another way, we practice single-site winemaking as a way to try and capture, as best as possible, the singular qualities of any particular vineyard property. To say this is to capture “terroir” is to invite critical debate to be sure, as the term has become rather loaded; suffice it to say that our wines taste the way they do primarily because of where they come from. If thats’ terroir, so be it.

Anyhow, the idea behind this special tasting was to try and showcase some key ways in which single-site winemaking can affect the character of a wine. For this 6-wine flight, I set up three sets of two wines to taste side-by-side, with each duo being selected to effect a compare-and-contrast between two sides of a spectrum.

For the first pair, I selected the 2006 Ponzo as an example of a Cool-Climate zinfandel, and I selected the 2006 Paso Robles as an example of a Warm-Climate zinfandel; for the second duo, I selected the 2006 Pagani Ranch as an example of an Old-Vine Interplanted zinfandel blend, and the 2006 East Bench as a Younger Vine Solo Varietal zinfandel; for the final duo, I selected our “Flagship” zinfandels, the 2006 Lytton Springs, and the 2006 Geyserville.

I am happy to report that in each case the collective response to the pairings was that all involved agreed there were marked differences between the two wines being compared. To my palate, the distinctions were very clear; in the first duo, the Ponzo, being a cool-climate offering, is leaner, more elegant, with a heightened focus on acidity and spice as opposed to opulent fruit. The Paso Robles, conversely, being a warmer-climate offering, is all about fruit; ripe fruit, sweet fruit, big fruit. In the second duo, the Pagani is multi-tiered and multi-dimensional, showcasing a veritable potpourri of aromatics and spices, yet its bodyweight and mouthful are comparatively subtle; the East Bench, on the other hand, is all adolescent muscularity. It’s big, and firm, and structured, and it showcases great depth. In the final duo, we see, I think, the clearest proof-of-concept of just how important site-specificity is; on paper, these wines are very similar. They’re both zin blends backed by complimentary Rhone varietals. They’re both RIDGE wines. The vineyards are located within just a few miles of one another. And so on and so on. But yet they’re very different wines! Soil type is the primary answer here; the two properties share very little in the way of common soil type, and accordingly, they show very different characters. Again to my palate, the Lytton Springs is a quintessential expression of California fruit; fruit in all its opulent, fleshy, sweet beauty. Not too ripe, not too plush, just plain delicious. And the Geyserville is all about complexity; tertiary flavors, multi-dimensions, the spice, the earth, the rusticity. Together, these two “flagships” form the twin pillars of our zinfandel program.

And that was our Horizontal Multi-Designation Zinfandel Tasting! It was a lovely tasting, and I thank the Friends of the Winemakers for the support and their participation.

The 1996 Monte Bello, Some Quick Tasting Notes …

June 29, 2009

I just had a quick but lovely chance to take a nice taste of the 1996 Monte Bello out of a 375ml; something I’ve not had the opportunity to do for a while, and let me tell you, it was quite a treat; one of the finer showings I’ve had the pleasure of sampling recently. At the 750ml size I’d definitely still recommend flexing some patience, but if you’ve a 375ml on hand of the ’96, you certainly don’t need to feel guilty if you pop it tonight!

Anyhow, my notes, with some others to follow:

Appearance:
A black plum middle with a double-banded halo of inner blood-orange pulp and outer salmon-raspberry. Thick bowl glaze indicating supple and rich viscosity…

Aromatics:
Teriyaki and Soy Sauces right out of the gate, followed by parallel strains of ketchup and fried green tomatoes on one side, and cinnamon, clove, pepper steak, white pepper, and tarragon on the other, making for an intensely complex and hunger-inducing bouquet…

Front:
Bright, vivacious acidity, softly granular tannins, mouth-watering cranberry skin characteristics, tanginess of fruit pectin, and the sweetness of cherry pastries…

Mid-palate:
Still a little youthful warmth on the roof of the mouth, but otherwise a nice balanced spread of acid against tannin, fruit against spice …

Finish:
Long, warm, chest-filling, and deeply satisfying. A quick whiff of the glass ten minutes after emptying it reveals nice sweet fruit and lingering caramel undertones …

Summary:
As noted above, one of the most pleasurable Monte Bello tastings in my recent memory!

And here are some other thoughts:

Paul Draper, writing back in 1998, had this to say:

“Sensuous and complex, with layered fruit and beautifully integrated tannins, this is among the loveliest of the ‘90s. Accessible as a young wine, it will develop further with twelve to fifteen years of bottle age.”

And Stephen Tanzer, my oft-quoted personal wine-reviewer favorite, wrote this in 2000, which I think is particularly spot-on:

“Good full bright ruby. Wild, super-ripe aromas of cassis, plum, cocoa, soy sauce, leather, roasted game and plum sauce, all lifted by a floral note. Lush, thick and dense, but the currant, black cherry and menthol flavors are still austere. The slight green note repeats on the long finish, which features faintly gritty tannins. In an awkward stage today, but has all the elements to make a superb bottle.”

And here’s perhaps the most unexpected kicker; James Laube, who’s occasionally been known to be ever so slightly tough on us every once in a while, gave this vintage a 96 point rating in Wine Spectator!

Does Size Matter? The Great Glassware Debate!

June 29, 2009

Fifty years ago, Maximilian Riedel could have been a standout example of that archetypal staple of the American Retail frontier, the Traveling Salesman.

TravelingSalesman_I

I marvel at the amount of miles this Guru of Glassware logs in pursuit of his evangelical mission to spread the gospel of the glass; everywhere I turn within the admittedly finite country-of-the-mind that is the world of wine, I see Maximilian. He’s at this tasting, he’s at that restaurant, he’s profiled in this magazine, he’s on that television program. He’s everywhere.

maximilian%20riedel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And everywhere he goes, he leaves a trail of questions in his wake. This constantly replenished pool of incredulity could probably best be summed up with one querulous word, “Really?” Meaning, does glassware really make as much of a difference as Mr. Riedel would have us believe?

This is a question we field with startling regularity in the tasting room; for whatever reason, this topic seems to be of great interest to a great number of wine-drinking people. To what extent this is due to our Sultan of Stemware’s world-wide missionary endeavors I can’t say; it may in fact be due to the ever-increasing interest in wine in general in this country; it may have to do with the recession (in that, if people are staying in and eating at home more often, they’re going to need to up their serving chops as to the hows, whys, whens, and wheres of presenting wine with a meal); it may have to do the “manufactured need monster” that can often be capitalism (meaning, we might not actually need the glasses, but the market needs us to need them!); or it might simply be one of those cultural zeitgeist moments where, for whatever reason, a topic just captures the public imagination. Regardless, I personally find it quite an interesting topic, and accordingly, I enjoy discussing it.

My/our stance here at RIDGE is definitely a stance in favor of the notion that glassware shape/size has an important effect on one’s ability to fully appreciate what a wine has on offer, and I generally present two key reasons for this:

1) Controlled Aeration: In the same way that a decanter theoretically affords a wine a controlled environment in which to interact with oxygen, and develop accordingly as far as “opening up”, I believe a wine glass bowl does the very same thing (on an admittedly smaller scale), and that different shapes/sizes of glassware achieve this in varying ways, with different environments being theoretically more or less suited to the particular requirements imposed by any given wine.

2) Deployment of Wine across the Palate: Assuming that different areas of our mouths/palates do indeed experience flavor/taste differently (salty, sweet, bitter, sour, umami, etc.) then in theory, it should make sense that the order in which these different areas experience a wine will have an effect on our perception of the wine itself. As a weird example, if you eat a piece of peanut butter toast peanut-butter-side up, you’ll experience its flavor very differently than if you bite into it in the rather more unorthodox fashion of peanut-butter-side down. In the same way, if you drink a cab from a champagne flute (and by the way, I loathe champagne flutes, vastly preferring the Coupe Glass instead, which is a whole other story), all the wine goes straight to the middle of your tongue first, before it gets swirled around throughout the full range of one’s palate; alternatively, if you sip said cab from a big huge goblet, it will send the wine spilling into your cheeks, across the sides of your tongue, and between your lips and teeth all at once, thereby in theory giving you a very different picture of the wine.

In the end, I think the issue at hand can best be understood as one of trying to eke out as much complexity, and accordingly potential enjoyment, from the experience of drinking a glass of wine. One of course begins with the wine itself; the more the wine has on offer, the greater the potential for oenophilic satiation. And there are of course the somewhat more obtuse tertiary factors that one can group under the umbrella of “environmental factors”: time of day, time of year, alone vs. with company, solo vs. with food, etc. Anyhow, glassware, looked at in this fashion, becomes yet one more way in which the taster can expand the potential of the taste, and if in fact glassware can potentially eke even a little bit more satisfaction from the wine experience (or, conversely, sabotage it), then I think one owes it to oneself to take at least a little advantage of what “proper” glassware can bring to the table. Does one need a completely different glass for every single different type of wine? Probably not. But having even a few different options on hand can make a big difference.

If anyone is interested in some more thoughts on this matter, my post above originated with a contribution I originally made to a very interesting thread on westcoastwine.net about the influence of stemware.

In addition, should you be so curious, there is, on the Riedel website, a “Wine & Glass Guide,” whose purported purpose is to help one select the proper glass for any given wine and/or wine occasion. You can find it here.

And yes, full disclosure, the glasses we use in the Monte Bello Tasting Room are Riedels!

A Musical Evening Of Wine, A Wine-Full Evening Of Music!

June 26, 2009

I had the great pleasure of spending Thursday evening at decarolis design & marketing in San Jose as “wine host” for a Wine & Jazz themed event, courtesy of an invitation from Vince DeCarolis, principal and founder of the company. RIDGE doesn’t actually do a lot of off-site events of this sort, but when Vince wrote to query as to whether we might be interested, I have to admit I was intrigued. Partly, they’re a local business, and it’s always a good feeling to reach out and share some good times with members of one’s immediate community. Plus, Vince is a big supporter and fan of RIDGE wines, and a long-time member of our ATP Wine Program. And lastly, well, he said there’d be a jazz band. So yeah, I was interested. Vince came up and met with me at the Monte Bello Tasting Room, and after he described the details, I was sold; it sounded lovely.

And lovely it was! The event was held in the little cobblestone tree-lined courtyard behind the decarolis offices, table’d and umbrella’d, with room enough for a fish pond, bar, and food table, plus the band. Very fine digs indeed. And a very fine and kind crowd as well, running the gamut from serious, serious wine enthusiasts and RIDGE fans to the previously uninitiated; I fielded lots of good questions, had a number of very engaging conversations, and altogether enjoyed the rapport.

The event was catered by a restaurant I was personally not familiar with, but judging by what was on offer this particular evening, I’d certainly say they merit a visit if you’ve not been already. The restaurant is Eulipia Restaurant, and they’re just down the street. One of the staff members who was on hand at the event described the cuisine to me as “New American comfort food!”

We had three wines on offer for the evening, the 2007 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay, the 2007 Geyserville, and the 2006 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate (CabernetSauvignon/Merlot/Petit Verdot), all of which I thought were showing quite well. The chardonnay is really flexing its minerality right now, and judging by the comments from tasters at the event, this is something that all levels of experience (as regards palate) seem to note with a good deal of pleasure. The ’07 Geyserville was by far and away the most familiar of the three offerings to the gang at hand, and although still utterly in its infancy at this point, it was very well received, and a couple of very serious RIDGE-o-philes waxed notably rhapsodic about this vintage. Personally, I’m a big fan of the ’07; my preferences as regards the Geyerville are for the years when the zin percentage comes down slightly, and the complementary rhones, particularly the carignane, come up, and the ’07 is a great example of this; I think this model really allows for a lot of the second and third tier layers of spice and herbality to express themselves, and I think those components are at the heart of what make the Geyserville such a singular offering. The ’06 Cab Santa Cruz was easily the dark horse success of the evening, being seemingly less familiar, but eliciting the most appreciative of responses. Altogether, I think it was quite a nice trio.

The band, it turns out, is not actually a “straight ahead” jazz band per se, rather, they effect a suprisingly seamless series of moves between solidly approachable “soft bop” and a somewhat tropical and reggae-infused world vibe; appropriately enough, the band is named the “Altered Roots Quartet.” Their chops are rock solid, they’re in full command of touch and dynamic, and, courtesy of guitarist and luthier Andrew Sacco, they’ve got some beautiful instruments as well. Both Andrew and bassist Chris Wilder play custom-made guitars, and their sounds were remarkable; warm, round, crisp without being biting, fleshy without losing clarity. One visit to their website this morning pretty much confirmed what I already had felt the night before; anyone who name-checks both John Coltrane and Burning Spear in their list of influences is way alright by me …

Anyhow, that’s my scoop on the evening, thanks to all for inviting me, and here are a trio of photos to give a little more visual sense of how it all played out (please click to see full-size)…

‘Twas The Night Before The Wedding …

June 25, 2009

‘Twas the night before the wedding,

and all through the wine

(and in case you were wondering

the wedding was mine!)

 

yes, all through the wine

the wedding party did go,

and in case you were wondering,

I thought I would show …

 

Yes, I thought I would show

the offerings we offered

dispatched with great haste

from special RIDGE coffers …

 

We drank them from magnums

we drank them from splits

we let 750′s

pass ‘cross our lips …

 

Beginning with splits,

a size we could use,

we shared in the glory

of Cab Santa Cruz!

 

And oh 750,

the joy that it brings,

especially when pouring

’05 Lytton Springs!

 

And lastly, in magnums,

the ol’ olive branch,

extended in peace,

the ’02 Home Ranch!

How Posting On A Wine Blog About Jazz Can Make Magic Things Happen

June 19, 2009

I received the most wonderful gift very recently, and with the permission of my kindly benefactor, I’d like to tell you about it; I received a package in the mail, which I was not expecting, from an address I didn’t recognize. This of course happens sometimes here, but usually, the name of the business on the return label is instantly recognizable as being a wine-related business (“Oeno-Phonetics,” or “Aroma-Trunks,” or “Vino-Vessels,” or “Corks -n- Sporks,” or other such wondrousnesses …).

Anyhow, the address in question was The University of California Press. I was intrigued, particularly as it was addressed to me by name, as opposed to say, Tasting Room Manager, or Glass Buffing Specialist, or Spitton-Cleanser-Man. I opened the package with great anticipation, only to be utterly befuddled when I saw what was inside. Music books! Three wonderful books on Music! (Titles below, by the way …).

I picked the top one up, the autobiography of the great jazz pianist Horace Silver, and out from under the book cover slipped a note and a business card. It was from a Monte Bello Collector Member who is affiliated with the press, and he wrote that he had sent me these books after having read my post on  Wine & Jazz on this blog! What a wonderful gift to receive! I was thoroughly touched, and amazed all over again at just how social wine truly is; it draws our kindnesses out, our generosities, our spirits, and it never fails to assist in adding yet another story to the great canon of human fable throughout time immemorial …

Anyhow, here are the titles he sent; I highly recommend them all:

These books are all available on Amazon.com, or from The University of California Press.

Thank you kindly benefactor!

Quick View: The ’02 (A Quick Review Of The 2002 Ridge Vineyards Monte Bello)

June 19, 2009

I had a brief but very interesting opportunity to taste the 2002 Monte Bello yesterday, which I’d been gleefully anticipating for some time. As can be seen on the label image below …

02CMB1-L

…Paul Draper had estimated, back in ’04, that this vintage would ”reach another level of complexity with 6 to 8 years in bottle,” meaning it should be getting close to making a move. I was very curious to see if it had …

 

Here are my impressions:

Appearance:
Black plum belly and a vivid ruby limn; decidedly young-looking ; so bright! It was also uber-adhesive in the glass, with solid glaze, and no legs at all. The wine just hung there! The wine showed tremendously dense in the bowl, barely translucent at all, bespeaking some serious muscularity …

Aromatics: (disclaimer; the following five descriptors literally fell out of my mouth rapid-fire after just one sniff) Leather, chocolate, mint, menthol, all-spice. A few more good sniffs, and I came up with some earth (freshly turned, after a good rain) as well …

Front: No front-of-tongue-acid to speak of, but a good vibrancy tongue-side; quite a fleshy and viscous mouthfeel; it felt like chocolate milk on the palate!

Mid-Palate: TONS of teeth-to-gum tannins, youth, youth youth … youthful tannins everywhere! And lots of rich plummy notes starting to come through …

Finish: A trace of young heat, and very structured acidity, making for a long, strong, and slightly still-too-agressive finish…

Summary: Tasting the ’02 Monte Bello was like watching an amazing high-school athelete; you can see all the tremendous talent on display, but it’s all elbows and knees still … Put another way, I think Paul’s 20-projection may be on the conservative side! This is a tremendously structured offering, with everything needed to go the distance … I look very forward to watching this wine evolve (btw, I had a look through some archived reviews just now, to see if my impressions matched the “the usual suspects”; Parker gave it through 2030, Tanzer described it as “an infant”, and Heimoff estimated it would “come around” by 2016, so I guess I wasn’t too far off …))

The Beet Generation -or- We Got The Beet -or- Bestill My Beeting Heart -or- Grilled Beets And Petite Sirah, Oh My!

June 19, 2009

So there I was, standing in the kitchen, trying to decide what to make for dinner, and my missus said, “That reminds me, I need to use those beets …” But her particular and special treatment of beets is a more autumnal dish, so I pondered a bit, and then asked out loud, “Can you grillbeets?” It seemed rather unlikely. So I googled “grilled beets.” Turns out, it’s been done! So I went to work. (Photo at the end!)

First off, these were golden beets, fresh from the Santa Cruz Farmer’s Market. I chopped the greens off, and put them in boiling water. Then I put butter and olive in a skillet, and hit the heat to medium. When it was good and hot, I tossed in walnuts, and gobs of chipotle powder. Ummm, pan-fried chipotle walnuts … Next, I turned the oven on to 350, then got out some herbed Silver Goat chevre, sliced it into thick discs, and laid the discs in a pie dish. When the oven was ready, in went the discs of herbed chevre. Ummm, baked herbed chevre discs …

The beets took forever to soften up a bit, but once they did, I brought them out, rinsed them in cold water, and used a towel to rub the skins off. Beautiful! Then I sliced them into thick discs, roughly the same size as the chevre, and tossed them into a mixing bowl. I poured in a double-dollop of olive oil, and a fistful of herbes de provence salt, and tossed away. When they were good and slathered up, out they came, and on to the panini grill, which was set to medium.

While I waited for the beets, I took out of the oven the baked herb chevre, and put in the oven an oval of garlic-and-Parmesan flatbread (whole wheat dough, minced garlic, and shaved Parmesan). Checking the beets, I decided the temperature was too low; they weren’t getting properly charred. But soon enough, things were cooking! I turned them halfway, to of course achieve the cross-hatch (but then I got impatient and hungry, so the second cross was admittedly faint by comparison) …

Last step was the dressing; I went for a creamy mustard vinaigrette of sorts; I say of sorts because, consistency-wise, it was almost to a hollandaise level of creaminess, less of a dressing really. Anyhow, I used spicy french dijon, a vegetarian mayonnaise (I prefer the vegetarian over “traditional” for both consistency and acidity), rice wine vinegar, white wine (yes, the ’07 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate Chardonnay!), olive oil (plus the olive oil and chipotle residue from the walnut skillet!), and herbes de provence, all heavily whisked.

Don’t forget about the flatbread! (I said to myself then, and to myself now …) Out it came, browned, but with the crust still soft enough to cut. Which I did. With a pair of kitchen scissors, I cut the flat bread into long thin strips.

Time to plate the dish. First, a bed of chopped organic romaine and shredded green cabbage. Then, the pan-fried chipotle walnuts, scattered. Then two overlaid concentric circles of baked herbed chevre and grilled beets. Then, around the perimeter, the garlic and Parmesan flatbread strips. Over all this, a plush drizzle of the dressing. Excellent …

Now, the weird bit; what wine do you suppose we paired this with? Petite Sirah! Specifically the Ridge Vineyards 2002 Lytton Estate Petite Sirah. Not normally a wine I would think of for this sort of a meal; the dish would seem to beg white wine, or perhaps an elegant pinot. But a big, inky, chalky, muscular Petite Sirah? Heavens to murgatroid … The thing is, we just really wanted to drink this wine. I mean really … So we single-decanted, and let it aerate about half-an-hour … When it was ready, out came the plates, in went the wine (Riedels …), and down sat we. The consensus? They co-existed perfectly, if somewhat independently, meaning the dish and the wine didn’t, as my missus likes to say, do that thing;that thing that happens when a pairing magically becomes more than the sum of its parts. But the meal stood up quite well to the wine, and it actually brought out some florality and spice that I hadn’t previously noted in the Petite Sirah before. This was probably the best thing about the pairing, that the dish actually engaged the wine in a way I hadn’t seen before. And despite seeming like lighter fare, the dish was actually a rather hearty offering, courtesy of the creamy drizzle, the cheese, and the umami savoriness from the charr on the beets. So they made a great couple, this dish, and that wine, with one particularly informing the other. We finished the wine down to the last drop, and scraped the plates clear (I’ll confess to finishing my missus’ flatbread; she was full!)

And that’s the scoop …

All in all, a very, very pleasant repast. See below (please click for full size) …

GrilledBeets

The Diana Krall Wine List: “Any By Ridge!”

June 18, 2009

I gather this has been news for a little while now, but it’s just come back under my radar courtesy of some posting I did recently about Wine & Jazz. Thanks to the website The Smoking Gun, I spent some time this morning perusing Diana Krall’s rider requests (this is a document that artists send ahead detailing their requirements re: food, beverage, accommodations, etc.), and in particular a portion of the riderentitled “The Diana Krall Wine List.” I was impressed to find quite a sophisticated and detailed list of wines that Krall had approved for her backstage catering, and amidst all the specific selections, I was especially pleased to find the following:

“Any by Ridge”

 

Wonderful! You can see the whole list here.

More On Carignane -or- Carignane, Tom Hill, And Me -or- How The Ridge Vineyards 1992 Whitten Ranch Carignane Changed Everything For Me

June 18, 2009

Tom Hill has very kindly allowed me to post some excerpts from his recent tasting of the 2007 Ridge Vineyards Buchignani Ranch Carignane, so I thought I’d share, so it isn’t always me up on the pulpit (My bit comes at the end of the post)!

 Fresh off the boat, I cracked last night:

“Very dark/black color; very strong dusty/old vines black cherry/plummy/blackberry/Carignane bit herbal light toasty/oak/DraperPerfume quite spicy nose; bit hard/tannic/acid rich/black cherry/black berry/Carignane slight herbal/dusty/old vines light smokey/toasty/oak flavor; very long bit hard/tannic/bitey plummy/black cherry/Carignane rather dusty/old vines finish w/ fair tannins; much more fruit than previous Buchignani Carignanes; still a bit hard on palate. $28.00 (ATP)”

And this …

“And a wee BloodyPulpit:

1. Carignane: Another grape I have trouble getting my arms around.

There’s a lot of old Carignane vnyds in Calif and that’s what attracts PaulDraper to the variety. He is, without doubt, the most skilled winemaker in Calif w/ the variety.

   I like the aromatics of Carignane, which reminds me of black cherry & blackberries, maybe a little Sangio-like. But they ofen have this rather mean acid/tannic/hard bite on the palate and seldom show the lushness you get out of Zinfandel. I must admit that I can’t ever recall a Carignane that I thought even remotely approached greatness.

   So….with that background…I was expecting to find little to like about this Carignane. Surprise/surprise….I liked this Carignane quite a lot. It had much more fruit than any Buchignani Carignanes I’ve yet had. The tannic bite was there, but the wine was not nearly as severe/hard on the palate as usual. Maybe the best young Ridge Carignane I’ve yet had.”

 Tom goes on to discuss some issues related to Carignane’s potential (or lack thereof) for aging, noting that historically, this varietal doesn’t appear to very effectively go the long haul very often. Which, prior to about a month ago, I think I might have agreed with, not having tasted many aged Carignanes. But then the 1992 Ridge Vineyards Whitten Ranch Carignane came across my bow, and changed everything for me.

92rwr1

When I tasted this wine, and when I wrote my original tasting notes, I had no idea I was going to be writing about it later, or defending it in any way; also, the wine was/is not commercially available, so my notes were written with no thought towards presenting the wine to the public. Essentially, the notes were completely innocent and neutral. Here is what I wrote (and mind you, we’re talking about a 17-year old solo varietal Carignane that Paul Draper originally estimated would be at its best no later than 1996!):

Appearance: Mid-tone ruby with a pale violet limn; somewhat granular and sedimented, and not particularly viscous in the bowl.

Aromatics: Surprisingly savory! Hits of jerkied beef & peppercorn. Also, some cocoa and bread crush notes … plus, strong hints of cherry fruit …

Front: Lots of cherry now, with a dusty-ish mouthfeel and a lean-ish body weight …

Mid-Palate: Some oak and cedar notes emerging, alongside some fascinating hints of both persimmon and pemmican.

Finish: Warm, ripe, with good controlled acidity.

Summary: Absolutely drinkable! Amazing to see the well-known Carignane acidity so tempered, without a parallel disappearance of everything else over such a long time. An eye-opener for sure …

So there you go! Who says Carignane can’t age …

And by the way, as recently as 2006, Carignane was referred to by none other than Steve De Long (author of De Long’s Wine Grape Varietal Table,  and founder of the Wine Century Club) as a “Hipster Wine!” Just a funny lil’ side note … You can find the article here on our Ridge website, or here on Steve De Long’s site, should you want to read it. It’s quite amusing, actually … the article begins with him comparing Carignane and blue jeans … I’d recommend reading it on Steve’s site actually; the comments from readers are quite good …


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers