Archive for April, 2009

Discovering Tepusquet: Inside The History

April 30, 2009

Sometimes, when researching a particularly fascinating wine query, or a singularly obscure vineyard offering, one just has to go straight to the source. Cue Mr. Paul Draper!

 

“I am delighted that the 1981 Cabernet from the Tepusquet Vineyard in Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County was showing well.

We have produced the Monte Bello Cabernet in every year from 1962 to the present, but declassified it only in 1966, 1979 and 1983.  We made cabernets from outside vineyards in those years.

Starting in 1971 with the Eisele Cabernet (now Araujo) from Napa Valley, we attempted to learn what other vineyards and regions could produce if we used our traditional methods in fermenting the wines.  We have made cabernet from Howell Mountain in Napa Valley, Bradford Mountain in Sonoma, Mount Madonna in the Santa Cruz Mountains and in 1981 from a hillside vineyard in Mendocino as well as the Tepusquet.  All of these were one year or two year experiments. Of course, the excellent York Creek cabernet from the Spring Mountain District in Napa Valley was a wine we made for many years.

Our conclusion was that as interesting as these wines were, the individuality of Monte Bello was the most distinctive and as the replanted parcels, abandoned during Prohibition, were now mature, we no longer needed to buy cabernet grapes from outside the estate.”

 

And that’s the scoop! Mystery solved!

PS: RE: The 06′ Santa Cruz Mountains Estate – A Story About Cheese!

April 30, 2009

I just remembered, I actually had one other opportunity to taste this wine recently (the new 2006 Ridge Santa Cruz Mountains Estate), in the context of a “trade” tasting, and I happened to be able to taste it with an outstanding cheese; Cowgirl Creamery’s “Mt. Tam.” Based in Point Reyes Station, CA, Cowgirl Creamery makes some astonishingly fine cheeses, and the Mt. Tam is no exception. It’s a pasteurized cow’s milk cheese that utilizes vegetarian microbial rennet, and it is organic. (It also, by the way, won First Prize at the American Cheese Society Competition: soft-ripened category)! It’s earthy in a mushroomy sort of way, and definitely funky; but highly funky delicious! Its soft, smooth, concentrated triple-cream middle is wrapped in a rind that I can only describe as mouth-wateringly pungent; it was actually a perfect complement to the young cabernet sauvignon-based blend that is the Santa Cruz Mountains Estate right now; the youthful acidity provides a great counterbalancing cut to the warm, buttery triple-cream density, and the funky Mt. Tam Rind accents and draws out all the complex herbality currently available in the wine. I must confess, I was a bit woozy afterwards! Quite  a treat …

The Weekend At Monte Bello: 2006 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate To Be Poured!

April 30, 2009

We’re looking particularly forward to this weekend’s tasting menu, as we’ll be pouring the new 2006 Santa Cruz Mountains Estate for the first time since our Spring Release Weekend! Featuring 19 parcels worth of Monte Bello fruit, in a blend of 56% cabernet sauvignon, 42% merlot, and 2% petit verdot, and aged for 22 months entirely in american oak (half new, a quarter two years old, a quarter three/four years old), I think this is due to emerge into a truly beautiful wine as it matures over time. Winemaker Eric Baugher has given a ten-to-fifteen-year estimation for development, so this is obviously still a wine very much in its youth. That said, there was a tremendous amount of excitement about this vintage when the tasting room staff tasted it in advance of its official release, and it also seemed to go over exceptionally well with our guests on Spring Release Weekend, so I think there is definitely a lot to be said for taking a look at this wine right now.

 

So, if anyone out there came to Monte Bello or Lytton Springs that first weekend in April, I’d love to  hear your thoughts on this new vintage of the Santa Cruz Mountains Estate! Our Tasting Room Staff will be compiling some notes and thoughts on this wine as we taste it over the weekend, and I’ll be posting again on Monday about our thoughts.

8-vintage Monte Bello Vertical Review At JancisRobinson.com!

April 27, 2009

Jancis Robinson has written a fascinating review of  8 different Monte Bello vintages at her site, jancisrobinson.com. If anyone reads her article, please let me know your thoughts, and if you have your own tasting notes to compare and contrast, all the better! (Please feel free to send them across, thank you!)

The Long Look Backwards: Vintage Ridge Labels

April 27, 2009
One of the truly great things about working at Ridge is the contact you have with people who are long, long time Ridge supporters. Not a weekend goes by where I don’t find myself in fantastic conversations with “vintage” Ridge-ers. One of the more delightful things that often happens is that these folks bring in wines from their own cellars to enjoy in our picnic area. This past weekend was just such an occurrence; spying a set of 98 and 99 Ridge Syrahs on one of the tables, I couldn’t resist going up to chat. Not only did I meet a great couple on a first visit from Texas, I also met one William Powell (whom the Texas couple were in visiting), who absolutely dazzled me with the extent of his knowledge about Ridge. I look forward to posting a great many stories from and about Mr. Powell, but today, I want to share some brilliant images he’s forwarded on to me. And major kudos to him for saving these gems for so long; what follows are three of some of the great old Ridge Labels that he’s been collecting over the years. Thank you Mr. Powell!
 
ridge67cab1
 
ridgebarberamorganhill77
 
 

Ridge California Cabernet Sauvignon Tepusquet 1981: A Mystery To Unravel?

April 25, 2009

I recently received an extraordinary e-mail from a Ridge fan, and they have very kindly allowed me to include some language from their correspondence. Please see below:

“I found a bottle of Ridge California Cabernet Sauvignon Tepusquet 1981 in a store near Savannah Georgia a few years ago.  I decided to open it recently and I can report that it was absolutely excellent.  Although it was obviously an old wine it still had plenty of fruit and even a touch of tannin, with lots of wonderful earthy and woody overtones that can only come with bottle age and a fine wine. (The label said it would be at its best over the next three or four years!)”

I think I can safely say this is the first e-mail I’ve seen to mention this extraordinarily rare offering, and as I begin my detective work on this wine, I thought I’d see if anyone else out there has some familiarity, or perhaps an experience to share.

If you know this wine, please share you’re story! Enquiring minds want to know!

Calendrical Anticipations: Preparing To Re-Visit The 1993 Monte Bello

April 24, 2009

In the very near future I’ll be engaging in the rather wonderful act of tasting the 1993 Monte Bello again. In preparation, I thought I would take a look at two different items; my Monte Bello Tracker, and my tasting notes from the last time I tasted this wine. My Monte Bello Tracker is a spreadsheet of notes on each vintage of the Monte Bello, and in it I found a few interesting items: 1) there was no original “estimate of longevity” in the back label notes, which is very uncharacteristic of our labels (Paul Draper did say it “has the intense fruit and long, elegant finish of a classic Monte Bello”). 2) When Paul tasted this wine again in the fall of 2008, he gave it a 0-15 year window, and 3) James Laube gave it a 92 in Wine Spectator, and Wine Enthusiast named it a Top 100 wine. And here are my tasting notes from when I last tasted this vintage, which oddly enough was in October of 2008 as well! (I wasn’t with Paul at the time, however):

Ridge Vineyards 1993 Monte Bello,  tasted October 2008, Christopher Watkins

Appearance:

Pale garnet limn surrounding a deep black cherry core. VERY viscous, just a solid wall of glaze adhering to the inner bowl

Aromatics:

Dominant strains of stewed plum, black cherry, and raisin; surprisingly ripe aromatics, strong extracted skin presence; nice, exotic spice notes of black cardamom and fennel, alongside black pepper and anise. Slight hints of root and bark, and a very subtle menthol note

Front:

Somewhat unexpectedly bright and elegant on the tongue-tip and gums; red plum and raspberry comes through, and a hint of jamminess in the flavor, though not in body-weight; it’s not chewy, just surprisingly, buoyantly fruit-forward.

Mid-Palate:

Very fresh acidity, widespread complexities filling out across the full palate, and great balance; earth to herb, spice to fruit, etc.

Finish:

The overtly ripe notes return a bit on the finish, giving a slightly burnt character to the otherwise supple, almost gentle decay. Acids win out over the tannins here, but are in no way obstreperous.

Summary:

A somewhat unexpected array of characteristics, but defnitely a more-than-pleasant set of suprises. A very singular combination of intensely ripe plum, black cherry, and raisin notes counterbalanced by a light, bright red fruit playfulness; great acidity, though somewhat lacking in tannic architecture. A fascinating wine to drink, but ever-so-slightly structurally unhinged at this point. I look extrememly forward to getting to know this wine better over more time, and watching its architecture emerge; its  components integrate and intensify; it singularities refine, and its melodies harmonize.

I’ll be posting new tasting notes after I’ve  had the opportunity to re-visit this vintage. In the interim, if anyone has thought, experiences, tasting notes for the 1993 Monte Bello, please let me know!

To Balsamic Or Not To Balsamic: Red Wine & Mushrooms

April 24, 2009

We just got a new Panini griller at home. I haven’t used it yet, but whatever color Portabello mushrooms are, that’s the color I’ve been dreaming in since we got it. And in this dream, I break the stems off, and I wash the mushrooms in cool water. Then I cut long thin grooves into their crowns. Then I pad them with paper towels, and let them rest after their ordeal. In the interim, I pour olive oil into a shallow pie glass. And I pour in some red wine (this changes each time I dream; most recently, it was Chilean carménère for some reason). And I shake in some home-grown and home-dried basil. And I shake in a pinch or two of Italian herbed salt. I shake it, and then I let it rest too. Then I pour olive oil into a small skillet, and wait for it to heat. While it heats, I slice up two cloves of garlic; chunky, not fine. And when the oil is ready, in goes the garlic; it just barely sizzles, I just barely smile.

I have a bottle of 05 Geyserville, and I open it. I decant it. I double decant it. The garlic is starting to brown (the oil is at a very low temperature). I am starting to thirst. One for the chef, one for the garlic. One more for the chef. I smile obviously. The garlic in pink and brown, and ready. It goes into the pie glass.

While I wait for the mixture to cool down, I have more Geyserville. This is the moment of truth; I’ve heard it said umpteenth times that one shouldn’t mix vinegar-based items with red wine. But if I just put a dollop of balsamic in the pie glass, and then I put those portabellos in upside down, so that that lovely mixture just seeps into those grooves and permeates the mushrooms inner flesh, and if I then heated the griller, and if I then put those mushrooms on that griller when it was hot, then that balsamic addition would get a little sticky, and a little sweet, and a little burny, and it would counterbalance the bite of the garlic, the viscosity of the oil, and the herbality of the basil, in such a way that I would be so, so happy. And the kitchen would smell so sexy. In fact, the whole house would smell so sexy. So sexy that, when I open and decant the special 97 Lytton Syrah that I’ve been saving I would almost become woozy. But what have I done? Red wine, really, really good red wine, and something marinated in vinegar? What have I done? Have you done it? What happened? Enquiring minds want to know …

A Spy In The House Of Cards: An Inside Look At Building Tasting Flights, Part I

April 24, 2009

Courtesy of Ridge’s deep portfolio of single-site offerings and vintages both back and current, we have the luxury of completely re-tooling our tasting flights every weekend. Accordingly, one of the most important preparatory endeavors I engage in is selecting which wines to pour, and in what order. It’s surprisingly easy to kill a wine’s sales simply by putting it in the wrong spot; for example, pouring a light-bodied and elegant wine that showcases particularly vibrant acidity immediately after a big, fleshy, opulent fruit-driven wine can leave it seeming underwhelming, even sour; it may be a phenomenal wine, but placed inappropriately, not only its sales, but its reputation can suffer.

Of course I’d be a liar if I said that commercial considerations play no part in the decision-making process; showcasing new releases, sale items, wines with larger inventories, etc., but truthfully, the primary influencing factor is how the wines are showing. Wines are living, breathing things that have mood swings and stages, good days and not-so-good-days, happy days and cranky days, and just as in the example above, showing a wine at an inappropriate time can not only damage its sales in the short term, but it can do long-term reputational damage as well.

For a lot of people, a visit to a tasting room is the first opportunity to try a wine that they’ve long heard about, long wondered about, and long desired. And remember, we’re not particularly easy to get to either! So here comes someone, for example, who’s visiting from, say, Australia, and they’re an arch wine lover, and they’ve been hearing about the Monte Bello all their lives, and they’ve got in-laws in Los Angeles now, and so they’re visiting, and this person figures, what the heck, it’s still California, and Monte Bello is in California, and I’m in California, so I’m going to Monte Bello! So they rent a car, and they drive 7 hours up to Cupertino, and then they drive the 5 miles up the mountain, and they’re finally here, and we’ve actually got a Monte Bello on the tasting flight! So here it is, the magic moment, and what happens?

Well, hopefully what doesn’t happen is that I neglect to check in on whatever vintage of Monte Bello I’m offering ahead of time, and so maybe I don’t realize that, as a young vintage, it’s still very tight, and not showing a lot of fruit yet, and because I don’t check ahead of time, I just automatically put it at the end of the flight, not realizing that I am putting it in right after a very large, fruit-driven, plush and ripe zinfandel. And this person tastes it, and lo and behold, they’re underwhelmed. Hopefully that’s not what happens, because then they go back south, and everyone asks, because they know how excited this person was, and so this person says, well, it wasn’t as good as I thought it was going to be. And that’s what they keep saying, all the way home on the long plane ride, and all over Australia, where, who knows, maybe they’re a traveling salesperson or something, and maybe on one of their trips they catch a baby falling out of a window or something, and it’s the daughter of some really rich person, and this rich person gives them a big reward for saving their daughter, and then they’re famous overnight, and they’re on Australian talk shows for a whole week, and in every interview people ask what this person is going to do with the reward money, and this person says they don’t know because, until their trip to California, they would have used it to buy Monte Bello, but now, who knows, and pretty soon, the Monte Bello get an international bad rap, and all because I assumed rather than tasted. Except that hopefully, I didn’t! Part II soon …

Origins of 4488: A Ridge Blog

April 20, 2009

The Ridge Monte Bello Tasting Room sits at approximately 2,300 feet up Black Mountain, to the west of Cupertino, California, where it is surrounded by the head-trained and hand-harvested vines that provide fruit for Ridge’s flagship Monte Bello. With windows overlooking the visual splendor and rustic glory of the Santa Cruz Mountains, the tasting room affords an intimate, educational, and delicious opportunity to enter the world of Ridge; a viticultural realm where single-site winemaking values are tirelessly championed, non-interventionist vineyard practices are determinedly upheld, and a devotion to nature and tradition rules the day. As with Ridge’s Lytton Springs Tasting Room in Healdsburg, California, the Monte Bello Tasting Room staff are a singularly passionate coterie of oenophilic fanatics who deeply enjoy every opportunity to talk wine with visitors both novice and expert alike; about all things Ridge, and all things wine. Far more often than not, these conversations across the bar quickly develop into informal and interactive colloquia on subjects running the gamut from questions of culinary companionability to traits of terroir; characteristics of carignane to the merits of multi-format bottling; debates on dry-farming to value judgments on verticals and vintages, and more.

Christopher Watkins, Tasting Room Manager at Ridge Vineyards, hosts this blog as an on-going opportunity to carry these conversations out into the larger world; if you are a lover of Ridge, a lover of wine, or just want to learn how to use an Ah-So Cork Puller, you are most cordially invited to visit, to read, and to respond. Whether you’re curious about how a certain vintage of Monte Bello is currently showing, want to chime in on the order of last weekend’s tasting flight, or suggest a dish to pair with a young zinfandel, 4488: A Ridge Blog welcomes you with open arms and a full glass!

p.s. Ridge became California Bonded Winery (BW) #4488 in 1962!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers